State Public Sector Retirement Plan Roundup
Here are some of the more noteworthy 2011 reforms from across the country, which were compiled from various sources.
Across the country states are introducing pension reforms as they grapple with shrinking coffers and growing pension obligations. In the Northeast, Rhode Island introduced sweeping changes to its pension system last November, including switching from a defined benefit to a hybrid defined contribution plan. In the South, states such as Florida and Louisiana have increased employee contributions and passed other significant measures. In the Midwest, Illinois faces a staggering pension shortfall as legislators work to pass a series of reforms. And in the West, California, the nation’s largest public pension system, is wrestling with a $612 billion debt—the largest in the country, according to the Pew Center on the States. Workforce Management examined some of the more noteworthy 2011 reforms from across the country, which were compiled from various sources.
CONNECTICUT: Broad changes included health plan and wage and salary modifications. Members saw benefit reductions for early retirement, increases in age and service requirements for normal retirement, and cost-of-living-adjustment reductions and vesting changes.
DELAWARE: The First State changed the normal retirement age and contribution requirements for future employees, and increased vesting requirements from five to 10 years for current members. Overtime payments will be excluded from the final average compensation calculation. And the early retirement reduction factor increased slightly.
MAINE: The retirement age for most state employees with less than five years of service on July 1 increased from age 62 to age 65. Post-retirement benefits, including provisions for return to covered service, were put in place. Retiree cost-of-living adjustments were frozen for three years. And a working group is tasked with closing the current defined benefit retirement plan and replacing it with a new plan that will supplement Social Security benefits.
MARYLAND: Changes to Maryland’s retirement plans included increases to employee contribution requirements for most members, and a 3 percent cap on retiree Cost-of-living-adjustment increases. Normal service retirement eligibility increased, as did early retirement eligibility. New members in the Deferred Retirement Option Program will earn a lower interest rate on their accounts, and the pension plan retirement formula is changing for future members. In addition, most retirees will now wait five instead of nine years to be exempt from a re-employment earnings limitation.
MASSACHUSETTS: Changes included increased employee contributions for all pension plan members with the exception of police and firefighters with more than 40 years of service.
NEW HAMPSHIRE: The state changed its pension benefits formula and increased the normal retirement age from 60 to 65 for future members. And in an unusual move, House Bill 491 called for New Hampshire to stop divestiture of retirement system assets relating to Sudan if it would result in economic harm to the system’s trust fund. The law originally was passed to protest reports of genocide in the Darfur region. In recent years, several states, such as Ohio and Arizona, have passed laws seeking to divest pension fund assets linked to the northeast African nation.
NEW JERSEY: Sweeping changes raised the retirement age for younger workers, increased employee contribution rates to 8.5 percent and added cost-of-living-adjustment reductions. Benefits formulas changes are in store for most members, and early retirement rules saw an increase in age and service requirements.
RHODE ISLAND: Rhode Island’s Retirement Security Act changed pension plan eligibility for most members, and increased contribution rates, while decreasing vesting requirements. Most state employees will be enrolled in a new 401(k)-style hybrid plan that has a 1 percent match. Cost-of-living-adjustment increases are suspended for future retirees until funding minimums are satisfied.
VERMONT: Employee contributions increased through July 1, 2016, or until the state’s retirement system is deemed to have assets equal to liabilities. During that time period, Vermont’s contribution to the plan will be reduced by up to $5.3 billion a year.
ALABAMA: Current and future members of the Retirement Systems of Alabama, excluding state police, will see increases of 2.25 percent to 2.5 percent in their required contributions to the plan. Employer contributions to the retirement plan will be reduced to offset the increased employee contributions.
FLORIDA: Employee contributions increased to 3 percent of salary, while state contributions will decrease this year and next for some employee groups. Interest rates on Deferred Retirement Option Program accounts will decrease for future plan members, and changes were made to vesting, service requirements and final average compensation rules for future pension plan members. Cost-of-living adjustments were eliminated for service after July 1, 2011.
LOUISIANA: Most employees will see increased contribution requirements, capped at 8 percent for some, to the pension plan. The benefits formula changed to prevent “pension spiking,” raising pay shortly before retirement to boost monthly benefits, in the calculation of final compensation. And ongoing efforts aim to reduce the unfunded liabilities of the Louisiana State Employees’ Retirement System and the Teachers’ Retirement System of Louisiana.
MISSISSIPPI: Future pension plan members will see contribution increases and increased years of service to receive full retirement benefits. Those who retire without meeting the age and service requirements will receive a benefit subject to an actuarial reduction based on their age and years-of-service requirements. Changes to the benefit formula include reduced percentage of salary and an increase in the number of years during which average compensation is calculated.
NORTH CAROLINA: Vesting requirements increased from five to 10 years for some plan members. In addition, the amortization periods for the accrued unfunded liabilities of the Teachers’ and State Employees’ Retirement System, Consolidated Judicial Retirement System, North Carolina National Guard Pension Fund and Firemen’s and Rescue Squad Workers’ Pension Fund increased from nine to 12 years.
WEST VIRGINIA: For members who joined the Public Employees Retirement System on or after July 1, 2011, the existing provision for retirement was amended to require five or more years of contributory service. Legislation also redefined the final average compensation formula to exclude attendance performance, recognition bonuses, or any one-time, flat-fee or lump-sum payment.
ILLINOIS: Pension reform has become a highly contentious issue among lawmakers as the state faces $139 billion in obligations owed employees in its five pension systems. The state has $63 billion in assets to pay for the retirement benefts. The Pew Center on the States has called it the worst-funded pension system in the country. Several bills are working their way through the Legislature.
INDIANA: In February, the state created a defined contribution plan for new employees. Workers can opt into the plan or go with the Public Employees’ Retirement Fund. For the defined contribution plan, participants contribute 3 percent of pay with a minimum state employer contribution of 3 percent.
KANSAS: A bipartisan commission study recommending the Kansas Public Employee Retirement System move to a defined contribution plan from a defined benefit plan was approved by the Legislature in January and will go into effect for new hires as of Jan. 1, 2013. The commission recommendations trigger certain reforms already signed by Gov. Sam Brownback in 2011, including increasing employer contributions to 1.2 percent by 2017, from the current 0.6 percent. Employees, categorized in specific tiers, will have to choose between increasing contributions and agreeing to a decreased final benefit.
NEBRASKA: Last May, Gov. Dave Heineman signed into law various contribution increases for members of Nebraska’s state school employees’, state troopers’ and Omaha school employees’ retirement systems. In December, about 400 state troopers filed a lawsuit in U.S. District Court in Lincoln, saying employee contribution increases were unconstitutional. Under the new law, troopers currently contribute 19 percent of pay. The Legislature will also study the costs of changing two state plans to cash-balance plans.
NORTH DAKOTA: Members of the North Dakota Public Employee Retirement System (including public employees, judges and troopers) will have their employee/employer contribution increase by 1 percentage point through 2013. Also, age and service requirements were increased for certain members of the Teachers’ Retirement Fund and participant contribution will increase to 9.75 percent on July 1 and 11.75 percent on July 1, 2014. Employer contributions will increase to 10.75 percent on July 1 and 12.75 percent on July 1, 2014.
OHIO: Opponents to an Ohio law—which was signed by Gov. John Kasich in March and stripped collective bargaining rights for state workers— similar to Wisconsin’s gathered 1.3 million signatures to force a referendum last November. Two-thirds of Ohio voters agreed with opponents and revoked the law. In addition to collective bargaining rights, the law, known as Senate Bill 5, would have banned public employers from paying contributions to any of the state’s public employees’ retirement funds unless employers reduce employees’ salary by the required contribution.
WISCONSIN: Gov. Scott Walker faced difficult choices in figuring out the $3.6 billion deficit in his state’s 2011-13 budget.
ARIZONA: As of July, employee contributions went up by 3 percent while employer contributions decreased by 3 percent. This was the first step in a series of reforms proposed by Gov. Jan Brewer after a 2010 investigative series in the Arizona Republic newspaper exposed widespread abuses in the public pension system. The state is considering moving to a defined contribution plan.
CALIFORNIA: Gov. Jerry Brown is proposing widespread reforms to the nation’s largest public pension system, including an increase in employee contributions and the creation of a hybrid pension plan that combines a 401(k)-style savings plan with an existing defined benefit system. The proposals will appear on the November ballot.
COLORADO: Lawmakers enacted sweeping public pension reforms in 2010, including raising employer and employee contributions and hiking the minimum retirement age from 55 to 60 for future employees. They also capped cost-of-living adjustments for current and future retirees at 2 percent, down from 3.5 percent, and froze them for a year.
MONTANA: Reforms were passed in July including a measure to prevent so-called “pension spiking.” In addition, retirement age increased from 60 to 65, and eligibility for early retirement increases from age 50 to 55 with five years of membership service for new hires. Employee contributions also went up from 6.9 percent to 7.9 percent.
OKLAHOMA: Lawmakers passed legislation to address $16 billion in unfunded liabilities—a gap that is more than twice the size of the entire state budget. Provisions include a ban on cost-of-living adjustments, an increase in retirement age for new employees, and the end of preferential retirement deals for elected officials over public employees. The law also requires municipal employees to forfeit retirement benefits if they have been convicted of crimes related to their office.
OREGON: Employer contribution rates doubled beginning in 2011. The state began offering a hybrid pension plan for new employees in 2003.
TEXAS: Last November, six months after legislation proposing a switch to a defined contribution plan was defeated, lawmakers ordered the Teacher Retirement System of Texas and three other pension funds to begin evaluating a variety of plans. The state is gearing up for sweeping pension reforms in 2013.
Lisa Beyer is a Workforce Management contributing editor. Patty Kujawa is a writer based in Milwaukee. Rita Pyrillis is Workforce Management’s senior writer. To comment email firstname.lastname@example.org.
Workforce Management, February 2012, pgs. 9-12 — Subscribe Now!