Top
Stories

Featured Article Getting Minorities to Buy In on Retirement February 13, 2012
Featured Article State Law Favored Over Feds in Overtime Case February 12, 2012
Featured Article Adopting a Social Media Mind-Set February 12, 2012
Featured Article Social Media and Collaboration Tools February 12, 2012
Featured Article Arbitration Pact Barring Class Lawsuits Violates NLRA February 12, 2012
Featured Article The Last Word: Backyard Retirement Plan February 11, 2012
Featured Article State Public Sector Retirement Plan Roundup February 10, 2012
Featured Article States Taking a Hard Look at Pensions February 10, 2012
Featured Article Wisconsin's Tough Choice February 10, 2012
Featured Article Small Employers Exploring Health Care Exchange Options February 8, 2012
Featured Article Tech Talk February 8, 2012

Latest News

UAW Retiree Health Care Looms as Obstacle in Bailout Talks

The union won’t accept further concessions on retiree health care costs unless GM creditors make substantial sacrifices to reduce the automaker’s crushing debt burden.

  • February 12, 2009
  • Comments (0)

Health care for UAW retirees is looming as a major controversy in crucial bailout negotiations at General Motors.

The United Auto Workers won’t accept further concessions on retiree health care costs unless GM creditors make substantial sacrifices to reduce the automaker’s crushing debt burden, said a source familiar with the union’s position.

Only six days remain until GM and Chrysler file viability plans with the federal government. Those plans are supposed to include major cost-cutting sacrifices by all stakeholders.

Under the terms of a $13.4 billion emergency loan commitment, the federal government wants two-thirds of GM’s debt exchanged for equity.

GM and government officials met with bondholders and creditors in Detroit on Monday, February 9, to see whether the creditors would do so. Those creditors hold $45 billion worth of GM debt. GM spokeswoman Julie Gibson declined to comment.

The UAW is insisting that the creditors make concessions, the source said. So far, the union thinks, it is the only party—among bondholders, dealers and suppliers—that has made major concessions to help GM keep its loans.

The government can call in the loans and put both GM and Chrysler in Chapter 11 bankruptcy if officials deem the viability plans inadequate. The union wants to avoid that outcome, the source said. But union officials think they cannot continue to bear what they call a disproportionate share of the sacrifices.

The debate centers on the UAW’s retiree health care trusts, known as voluntary employee beneficiary associations. Under terms of the federal bailout, the UAW is supposed to accept GM stock in place of cash for half of the automaker’s $26 billion obligation to the health care trust.

That’s a big problem for UAW president Ron Gettelfinger, the source said.

Gettelfinger insists that the union already swallowed a massive concession when it negotiated the VEBAs in 2005 and 2007, the source said. Together, those earlier agreements cut GM’s UAW health care obligation from $50 billion to $26 billion.

Now the union is being asked to take risky GM equity for half the remaining $26 billion obligation. That’s an untenable sacrifice when other stakeholders haven’t even anted up yet, the source said.

“That’s what Ron means when he says the UAW has gone to first base, second and third to help GM when the others haven’t even entered the stadium,” the source said. UAW spokeswoman Christine Moroski declined to comment for this story.

What’s more, the UAW last month agreed to end the Jobs Bank at the Detroit Three. Under the Jobs Bank, long-term idled workers collected about 95 percent of wages and benefits while not working. The Jobs Bank could have cost GM alone up to $2.1 billion over the four-year life of its UAW contract signed in 2007, the contract shows.

Filed by David Barkholz of Automotive News, a sister publication of Workforce Management. To comment, e-mail editors@workforce.com

Workforce Management's online news feed is now available via Twitter

Leave A Comment

Guidelines: Comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. We will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. You are fully responsible for the content you post.

Daily Q&A

Are We the Only Company Laboring to Manage Our Expats?

How do we better manage our expat process? Ideally, we'd like to have some type of case-management tool that enables us to make sure we place the right people in the right overseas assignment. Could you share some pointers on how we can make sure the expat process we use works to the benefit of our company and our expats?

—Gone but Not Forgotten, HR consultant, Montreal

Read Answer

Stay Connected

Join our community for unlimited access to the latest tips, news and information in the HR world.

HR Jobs

View All Job Listings

Search