RSS icon

Top Stories

Comparing Traditional and Target-specific Bargaining

May 1, 1996
Related Topics: Labor Relations, Featured Article
Reprints
Here is a reference guide that compares and contrasts the two kinds of bargaining.

TRADITIONAL

TARGET-SPECIFIC BARGAINING

  • Adversarial
  • Non-adversarial
  • Individual sent out to solve problem
  • Group generates a list of meaningful issues using brainstorming process
  • High failure rate with unresolved issues
  • High success rate because the group solves problems together and no issue is left unresolved
  • Chief spokesperson on both sides does all the talking
  • Recognizes a chief spokesperson but all members are empowered to discuss issues
  • No neutral facilitator
  • Uses a facilitator
  • Total disclosure of information-no witch hunts
  • Bargaining members are seen but not heard
  • Total participation of all bargaining team members is required
  • Secret side-agreements between parties
  • No sidebars are permitted based on the premise that what can't be said across the table isn't worth discussing
  • Bargaining members sit opposite each other at the table
  • Bargaining seating arrangement alternates labor and management representatives
  • Limited bargaining rights
  • Expanded bargaining rights
  •  

    SOURCE: Anthony J. Taylor

    Personnel Journal, May 1996, Vol. 75, No. 5, p. 104.

    Recent Articles by Donald D. Tippett and Joseph Costa

    Comments powered by Disqus

    Hr Jobs

    Loading
    View All Job Listings