OxyContin Settlement May Curb Narcotic Use in Workers’ Comp
Workers’ compensation observers say they hope a $635 million settlement of criminal and civil charges against the maker of OxyContin will deter overuse of addictive and costly painkillers.
The workers’ comp industry has warned for years that OxyContin and other narcotics have been prescribed too often to workers suffering from injuries not severe enough to require the use of such potent drugs.
Following a four-year investigation, the Food and Drug Administration, along with federal prosecutors, the IRS, the Health & Human Services Department and state officials announced May 10 that Stamford, Connecticut-based Purdue Pharma LP and Purdue Frederick Co. had agreed to pay $600 million as part of a settlement of allegations that Purdue sought to profit from “a long-term illegal scheme to promote, market and sell OxyContin,” the FDA said in a statement.
Under settlement terms, the company pleaded guilty to felony charges of misbranding the “addictive and highly abusable drug,” the FDA said.
Use of narcotics in workers’ comp cases is widespread. Preliminary results of a study by the California Workers’ Compensation Institute point to an “alarmingly high” use of narcotics, including OxyContin, to treat “garden variety” lower back sprains and strains.
Litigation, lost workdays and claims costs all increase dramatically when narcotics are prescribed, CWCI’s preliminary results show.
Problems with the abuse or misuse of OxyContin are not unique to workers’ comp cases, observers point out. Similar abuses occur in other areas of health care.
OxyContin is a synthetic narcotic that resembles natural opiates. Its abuse and misuse was publicized several years ago, prompting different organizations to question whether the drug was being over-prescribed.
In early 2004,
In a letter to the doctors,
The Boca Raton, Florida-based National Council on Compensation Insurance has studied OxyContin usage patterns in workers’ compensation cases and group health plans.
“We have long been concerned about the prevalent use of OxyContin,” says Barry Lipton, senior actuary and practice leader for NCCI. “If you include OxyContin and its generic equivalent, it’s the No. 1 drug prescribed in workers’ compensation ranked by cost. It’s used often in chronic pain management, which, given its addictive properties, we are concerned about.”
Federal prosecutors said Purdue trained its sales force to lie to doctors about OxyContin’s addictive nature, its likelihood for abuse, its ability to cause euphoria and withdrawal symptoms.
Purdue did not return a phone call seeking comment. But in a statement, Purdue Pharma blamed “some employees” who made or told other employees to make certain statements to doctors about OxyContin’s risks for addiction, abuse and withdrawal.
Purdue accepts responsibility and regrets past misstatements, the company said. During the past six years, it changed its training, compliance and monitoring systems while adding warnings and prescribing information for doctors, the company said.
Because OxyContin is not the only narcotic in widespread use among workers’ comp claimants, the NCCI’s Lipton and others say they hope the action against Purdue will serve as a warning about drug marketing and increase awareness about potential addiction.
Opioids such as OxyContin were created for acute pain or “end of life” conditions, says Keith Bateman, VP of workers’ compensation for the Property Casualty Insurers Association of America in
But a number of factors have led to their frequent “off-label” prescribing for ailments for which they were not originally intended, Bateman says.
As far as OxyContin, marketing by the drug’s manufacturer helped increase its use, he says.
“There is an awful lot of off-label use of medications in this country, and a lot of it is in workers’ comp,” Bateman says.
Filed by Roberto Ceniceros of Business Insurance, a sister publication of Workforce Management. To comment, e-mail firstname.lastname@example.org.