Community Center
Home
Complete archive of features and news articles, sample policies and procedures, assessments, and surveys.
Network and exchange ideas with other members in the forums or ask an expert in one of the hosted forums.
Access vendor directories, product case studies and showcases.
Read Best in Shows, view our conference calendar, read commentaries and take our news poll.
The Hot List
Blogs
Topic Channels
Comp, Benefits, Rewards
HR Management
Legal Insight
Recruiting and Staffing
Software and Technology
Training and Development
= Member Only
Workforce HR Jobs
Find A Job
Post A Job



Subscribe Now
Workforce Magazine
Subscriber Help
























= Member Only


Forums: Legal Forum
  

Legal Forum
Discuss employment-law issues such as family leave, overtime, disabilities law, harassment, immigration and termination.

Welcome to the Legal Forum. Before posting, you may want to look through past pages of this Forum to see if your question has been answered. Also, search the Research Center.

Please note that this forum is for workforce-management professionals only, and not for employees.


Workforce Management Community Center Forum Index » » Legal Forum » » FMLA (answered by EBG)



  
 
Author FMLA (answered by EBG)
GHOLTON


Joined: Oct 28, 2002
Posts: 2
Posted: 2002-10-28 17:22   
We are currently clarifying certain topics in our employee policy manual and handbook. A question arose as to whether certain "triggers" for FMLA eligibility can be employer defined? The scenario is this, we currently have a policy stating that if an employee calls in sick for 3 or more consecutive days, a note from the doctor is required to return to work. In the minds of some of our managers this would be enough to designate a serious medical condition and thus trigger FMLA eligibility. Others say more information is needed, if the employee simply took 4 days to get over a cold, that would hardly qualify. Hope you can help clear this up. Thanks.

ForumHosts
Legal Forum Host


Joined: Jul 09, 2002
Posts: 825
Posted: 2002-10-29 04:54   
If you are an employer subject to the FMLA, your family and medical leave policy must at least comply with what the FMLA requires-- in that sense, you are not free to define the "triggers" for FMLA eligibility. The FMLA, however, permits employers to give greater leave benefits to their employees that the statute requires-- in that sense you can define your own "triggers."

With respect to your current policy, the FMLA defines as a serious health condition, among other things, a period of incapacity of more than three consecutive calendar days, and any subsequent treatment or period of incapacity relating to the same condition, that also involves treatment two or more times by a health care provider (including a nurse, physician's assistant, etc.) or treatment by a health care provider on at least one occasion which results in a regimen of continuing tretment under the supervision of a health care provider.


weaverw


Joined: Oct 29, 2002
Posts: 2
Posted: 2002-10-29 08:14   
My company currently pays employees for up to 5 sick days (whether or not we think they are actually sick) and have recently stopped paying all individuals with approved FMLA. Why is it that someone can call in sick (and are actually just taking a day off) gets paid and someone who has cancer and is approved for FMLA does not get paid? How can a company as large as the one I work for get away with this? How should I proceed? I think my company is setting themselves up for law suits.

honeygirl_57


Joined: Jan 05, 2004
Posts: 1
Posted: 2004-01-05 17:01   
Our company has a policy that after 26 weeks of paid sick/workman's comp time, u are terminated. No matter what u are out sick for.....stroke, heart attack, hurt on the job, cancer, etc. Is this legal to do in the State of New Jersey??? Do I, or anyone else, have a chance in court getting our job back or never losing it in the first place???Diane

murfi


Joined: May 08, 2004
Posts: 1
Posted: 2004-05-08 23:44   
[quote]
On 2002-10-29 08:14, weaverw wrote:
My company currently pays employees for up to 5 sick days (whether or not we think they are actually sick) and have recently stopped paying all individuals with approved FMLA. Why is it that someone can call in sick (and are actually just taking a day off) gets paid and someone who has cancer and is approved for FMLA does not get paid? How can a company as large as the one I work for get away with this? How should I proceed? I think my company is setting themselves up for law suits.
[/quote]


nork3


Joined: Feb 12, 2002
Posts: 3876
Posted: 2004-05-10 15:54   
The Family and Medical Leave Act does not require employers to pay for time taken under the Act. It's actually the rare company which does provide compensation for such leave.

Many companies have either long term or short term disability plans or both. Such plans will provide some level of compensation (usually 66% of regular pay) for the period of time during which the employee is disabled. After six months of disability, Supplemental Social Security and Medicare both kick in.


  


Powered by phpBB Version 1.4.2
Copyright © 2000 - 2001 The phpBB Group




Sponsored Tools
Discover PCRecruiter HR Solutions
Web-Based HR Solutions Used By Organizations Worldwide. Schedule a Demo Now!
Take the Pain Out of Performance Reviews
Free eGuide: Make performance reviews easier — and much more effective
Quickly Comply with HR Regulations using TriNet
Total HR solutions designed for growing companies; Serving the U.S. and Canada.
Unique, Powerful Values-Based Ethics Programs!
Bauer Ethics Seminars focus on core values and how your employees can clarify and harness those values to reduce their risk of ethics problems. Move your ethics training program to the next level with great skills for making better decisions!
HR Management Certification
Choose a School, Request More Info, Start Earning Your Certification!




 Workforce Blogs

The Business of Management
Workforce Management editor John Hollon analyzes and comments on business, management and the art of leading a workforce.

Workforce Washington
Washington staff writer Mark Schoeff Jr. provides an insiders insights to the workings of our nations capital from the workforce management perspective.

Global Work Watch
Staff writer Ed Frauenheim blogs about how companies worldwide marshal and manage their workers.






Copyright © 1995-2009 Crain Communications Inc.
All Rights Reserved. Terms of Use Privacy Statement