 |
Dear Workforce: How Do We Avoid Subjectivity in Pre-Employment Tests?
Make sure you understand why you’re using these tools. Use them in conjunction with other measures when assessing potential employees.
Dear Workforce:
I’m concerned about the validity of assessment tests during the
pre-employment stage. The answers could be interpreted quite subjectively,
depending on the different experience or education level of the person reviewing
them. How do we avoid this?
--Getting a Grip on
Assessments, district trainer, retail trade, Mukwonago, Wisconsin
Dear
Getting a Grip:
You are wise to think carefully about the pre-employment tests you use.
There’s a risk, if they are badly designed, of discriminating--or being
perceived as discriminating--against a culture or gender. There’s an equally
great risk of wasting valuable time and resources if the test does not help
predict who would be able to perform the job.
All too often, tests are used because "we’ve always done that," or because a
hiring manager took an assessment at a workshop and now wants to know the same
information about everyone in the department. While assessments can be useful
for understanding others’ style, hiring in the style of such a nosy manager may
not be the best choice, and could in fact lead to biased decisions.
To avoid running into problems with your pre-hire testing process, do the
following:
Be sure you know
what you
are testing and that it is relevant to the job requirements. Do a job
analysis to be clear about the job demands that will be highlighted.
Use testing early in the process, so if the
individual’s scores raise questions, you have a method of following up on those
questions.
Work with a reputable test publisher to
select a
test that is best suited to your purposes, and use the test in accordance
with professional guidelines. If you’re unsure what those guidelines are, ask.
Use other selection methods in addition to
testing to get a well-rounded view of the candidate. Don’t put all your
selection eggs in the testing basket. In general, pre-employment testing should
be no more than one-third of your selection process.
Follow up on your testing process to ensure
that the test actually predicts high-performers, and that it is not creating
adverse impact.
Pre-employment testing has grown in popularity recently, and the science of
testing has come a long way. Online testing standardizes the tests and the
testing conditions, computerized scoring is fast and enables the easy creation
of statistically derived hiring benchmarks, and push-button reporting provides
interviewers with follow-up questions to ask when test results don’t match
exactly with the desired profile. Carefully choosing your pre-hire selection
tools should help you narrow the gap between a poor hiring choice and a
well-qualified candidate.
SOURCE: Patsy Svare,
managing director, The Chatfield Group,
Glenview, Illinois, December 1, 2003.
The information contained in this article is intended to provide useful
information on the topic covered, but should not be construed as legal advice or
a legal opinion. Also remember that state laws may differ from the federal law.
Top of Homepage Content | WorkforceHRjobs Archive
|
Reproductions and distribution of the above article are strictly prohibited. To order reprints and/or request permission to use the article in full or partial format, please contact our Reprint Sales Manager at (732) 723-0569.
|
|
 |
|
Similar Documents
Related Topics
|
|
Workforce Blogs |
|
The Business of Management
Workforce Management editor John Hollon analyzes and comments on business, management and the art of leading a workforce.
|
|
Workforce Washington
Washington staff writer Mark Schoeff Jr. provides an insider’s insights to the workings of our nation’s capital from the workforce management perspective.
|
|
Global Work Watch
Staff writer Ed Frauenheim blogs about how companies worldwide marshal and manage their workers.
|
|