Despite increasing movement among companies to freeze their pension plans,
consultants are warning that the step may not be the panacea employers hope it
to be.
GM announced last week that it would freeze pensions for salaried employees.
Other large employers, such as Verizon, IBM and Alcoa, also have said recently
that they will freeze pensions. The main argument for doing so is to reduce
costs and stay financially competitive in industries where other companies are
providing 401(k) plans, which typically cost less.
But frozen plans often require as much--if not more--attention than open
plans, says James Morris, senior vice president at SEI Investments, an Oaks,
Pennsylvania, provider of investment and technology services to plan sponsors.
"Often plan sponsors think they have dealt with their problems by freezing
their pension plans, but then they find themselves continuing to pour money into
them," he says.
The issue is that companies often continue to manage frozen plans as they did
when they were open, consultants say. But managing frozen plans can be more
difficult because it’s crucial to match assets and liabilities.
Unlike with growing pension plans, where overfunding can be used to deal with
liabilities later, there is no benefit in overfunding a frozen pension plan. "If
you have a surplus in a frozen plan, you have effectively put too much money in
the plan, and that doesn’t do you any good," says Richard McEvoy, principal and
senior consultant at Mercer Human Resource Consulting.
For this reason, companies that freeze their plans need to make sure they
line up their actuarial strategies with their investment strategies. They also
need to know what they intend to do with their plans. For example, if the goal
is to ultimately terminate the pension plan, companies need to manage the assets
and liabilities accordingly, Morris says.
Employers also need to make sure they have a well-thought-out communications
strategy in connection with the freezing of plans. At the very least, they must
alert participants to the freeze 45 days before they take that step, as ERISA
requires.
But looking beyond the freeze itself, organizations should create
communications that show employees in the plan what their fixed retirement
payments will be from the defined-benefit plan, and how investing in the
company’s 401(k) plan can add to that, McEvoy says.
Companies also need to communicate with employees about changes they make to
their 401(k) plans to encourage investors to participate, says Tom Murphy,
divisional practice leader for retirement practices at Watson Wyatt
Worldwide.
Employers must consider how a freeze affects employees attitudes. "They need
to address the immediate crisis and demoralization that occurs," says Alicia
Munnell, director of the Center for Retirement Research at Boston College.
Employers that freeze their pension plans also need to anticipate a change in
retirement patterns among older employees, she warns. No longer will workers
automatically retire when they reach 65, and many might stay much longer than
employers want them to, she says.
"Employees’ exit from the company as they get to retirement age now becomes
slippery and unpredictable," she says. "Companies need to think about that."
—Jessica Marquez