The shooting deaths at a mail distribution facility last month by a former
employee are a sad reminder of the importance that violence prevention should
play in workforce management--from candidate selection to employee
termination.
Jennifer Sanmarco, who had left her job as a clerk three years ago at the
Goleta, California, facility, fatally shot six postal employees before turning
the gun on herself. Based on a psychological evaluation, she was on
"involuntary" medical disability retirement, says Don Smeraldi, a U.S. Postal
Service spokesman. Sanmarco gained access to the processing and distribution
center by using the key card of a worker she held at gunpoint.
Investigators are still piecing together Sanmarco’s actions leading up to the
deadly rampage, but experts say previous cases show why organizations must
recognize problems and address them head-on, and not just hope the trouble goes
away.
"We’ve never seen a case where someone just snapped," says Marc McElhaney, a
psychologist and director of Critical Response Associates in Atlanta. "In every
single one, there are a series of events that either someone ignored or did not
respond to adequately."
That’s why McElhaney, author of Aggression in the Workplace, says the No. 1
step that employers should take is to adopt an anti-violence policy, explain it
to employees and make them aware of their responsibility for notifying
management of "antecedent signs" of workplace violence. Employees need to know
whom to tell about troublesome incidents, McElhaney says, and organizations
should have threat-management teams trained in how to respond when a problem
arises.
Psychologist William Berman says it’s difficult to predict workplace violence
because it’s rare, but having a zero-tolerance policy helps companies spot
workers in trouble. "If you limit the amount of aggression or abusive language
or hostility that you tolerate, the people who can’t control themselves become
more obvious and it’s easier to intervene with them," says Berman, a director at
Applied Psychological Techniques in Darien, Connecticut.
Violence prevention can begin even before a candidate is hired. Berman
recommends conducting background checks and asking references whether the
applicant has a history of violence, abusive behavior or substance abuse.
Out of fear of lawsuits, many former employers will not give anything more
than a confirmation of employment, says John Reese, marketing director for
HireRight, a background checking company based in Irvine, California.
Nevertheless, he says, it is not a bad idea for a prospective employer to ask
former colleagues of the candidate about their knowledge of any past incidents
of workplace violence. Some recent case law suggests that a former employer
could be exposed to liability for withholding factual information that could
have prevented a later incident, he says.
Co-workers and employers should take all threats seriously, says Doug Kane, a
former FBI agent and co-founder of Risk Control Strategies. Perpetrators often
discuss their plans. "They’re telling you that for a reason. They’re crying out
for help," Kane says. "If you don’t recognize that and instead think they’re
just blowing off steam, you’re going to be front-page news."
Employers also risk lawsuits if they don’t take measures to prevent workplace
violence. "Generally, if an employer had some type of warning signs that the
employee who started the incident had a propensity for violence, then the
employer likely can be held liable for anything that happens because of that
employee’s behavior," says Charles Wilson, an associate with the law firm
Epstein, Becker, Green, Wickliff & Hall.
Despite public perception, postal facilities are no more prone to workplace
violence than anywhere else, experts say. In fact, the U.S. Postal Service
studied the safety of its workplaces after several shooting. The findings,
issued in August 2000, indicated that postal facilities were as safe as the
average U.S. workplace.
" ‘Going postal’ is a myth, a bad rap," said the report’s introduction by
Joseph Califano Jr., chairman of the U.S. Postal Service Commission on a Safe
and Secure Workplace. "Postal workers are no more likely to physically assault,
sexually harass or verbally abuse their co-workers than employees in the
national workforce."
—Todd Henneman