On a day when
Home Depot chairman and CEO Robert Nardelli resigned with a $210 million
separation agreement, the incoming chairman of the House Financial Services
Committee indicated that he will offer legislation to give shareholders more
power in determining executive pay.
Rep. Barney
Frank, D-Massachusetts, who will assume his new position when Democrats
officially take over the House on Thursday, January 4, blasted the Atlanta-based
home improvement chain.
“The action of
Home Depot’s board of directors to simultaneously dismiss Robert Nardelli and
provide him with $210 million in severance is further confirmation of the need
to deal with a pattern of CEO pay that appears to be out of control,” Frank said
in a statement Wednesday, January 3.
Later, in a
speech at the National Press Club, Frank asserted that corporate boards give too
much leeway to the executives they’re supposed to oversee.
“Boards of
directors don’t provide any real check on CEOs,” he said. “They don’t stand up
to the CEO. They may stand up to the workers.”
In legislation
that he intends to introduce later in the congressional session, Frank will
propose that shareholders vote on executive compensation packages. Currently,
company boards set executive pay.
Most of the
shareholders who weigh in will be large funds like the California Public
Employees’ Retirement System, Frank said.
“They are
sophisticated and thoughtful, and corporations would benefit from their
increased participation,” he said.
Soaring
executive pay exacerbates growing income disparity, Frank argues. He cited
statistics showing that families with incomes below $92,000, or 90 percent of
Americans, saw their incomes fall 4 percent after inflation between 2001 and
2004—a time when the economy was expanding.
“Business
leaders who are frustrated by the unwillingness of the American voter to be
supportive of their agenda for economic growth should look to the contrast of
Mr. Nardelli’s consolation prize and the resistance of business to raising the
minimum wage,” Frank said in a statement.
He elaborated in
his Press Club speech, warning against the “increasing separation of the
well-being of the average citizen from overall economic growth.”
Part of the
problem is that the economy is often viewed in a Wall Street framework. “If
corporate profits go up, that’s a good thing,” Frank said. “If wages go up,
that’s a bad thing. That’s the perceived wisdom that I’m trying to
change.”
Democrats want
to shift the focus to workers. Frank advocates a “grand bargain” between
congressional Democratic majorities and the business community, which usually
finds Republicans more sympathetic to their causes.
In Frank’s deal,
businesses would facilitate unionization, support expanded health care, raise
wages and acquiesce to labor and environmental provisions in trade agreements.
In return, Democrats would back immigration reform, trade pacts and an easing of
rules on foreign direct investment.
Such an
agreement would break political deadlock, Frank maintains. “Right now, we’re
stalled,” he said. “That’s why the business community should
care.”
Several members
of the corporate lobby, however, were reticent to comment on Frank’s notion
until they learned more about it.
“It’s an
interesting theory, which means nothing until there’s specific legislation on
the floor,” says Martin Reiser, manager of government policy for Xerox Corp.
“It’s a little all-encompassing but at the same time
unspecific.”
One area where
Frank is explicit is his desire for the government to help those hurt by
globalization and technological advances. But he doesn’t advocate eliminating
inequality, just reducing it.
“Inequality is
necessary in a capitalistic system,” Frank said. “But you do not have to have
government reinforce it. You can have government retarding it. The public sector
needs to be valued as a partner.”
He also asserts
that unions improve quality of life on the job. For instance, he is wary of a
Wal-Mart’s new approach to workforce management.
The Wall Street Journal reported on January 3 that the massive
retailer will assign duties to workers at times when store traffic is highest,
regardless of traditional schedules.
“Yeah, and if
you have to pick your kid up at school, that’s tough,” Frank said. “Unions help
to protect people’s dignity in the workplace.”
—Mark Schoeff
Jr.