Senior managers
could be headed down a slippery slope, a newly released study from Watson Wyatt
Worldwide suggests. According to the report, employee ratings of senior
management took a slight dip in 2006, halting an upward trend that began in
2002.
The declines
took place across various areas of performance, says Ilene Gochman, a
Chicago-based national practice director for organization effectiveness.
Forty-nine percent of employees report having trust and confidence in the
performance of senior management, down from 51 percent in 2004. Two other
categories revealed a 4 percent decline since 2004. Fifty-three percent of
workers say senior management makes changes to stay competitive, down from 57
percent, while 55 percent report that senior management takes steps to control
costs, down from 59 percent.
Although the drops are not severe, they are troubling because they could
foreshadow the beginning of a general downward trend in how workers feel about
senior management, Gochman explains.
“The economy is
somewhat strong and unemployment is under control, yet ratings are coming down,”
she says. “Imagine what could happen if the situation became
unstable.”
A key
contributor in the ratings dip are chasms in communication strategies, which
corporations have unwittingly let widen since the terrorist attacks of September
11, 2001. The attacks, coupled with the flurry of corporate scandals led by
Enron, caused confusion and anxiety in the workforce.
Senior
management tackled the problem by launching a variety of outreach campaigns for
employees. More emphasis was placed on communications and personal interaction
with workers during that period. These concerted efforts temporarily drove up
performance ratings for senior management. However, it appears that corporations
may be letting their guard down.
The key to
getting back on a positive track could lie in adopting old-fashioned
communication tactics. “Face time is crucial,” Gochman says. “Going on site and
having lunches with employees in the cafeteria can work wonders.” She concedes,
however, that there are limits on the amount of time and resources that senior
management can dedicate to communicating in person with the workforce. She
recommends using technology to get around this issue.
Posting messages
on corporate intranets or sending out monthly newsletters, however, may not do
the trick. There are other tools that are far more personable and generate more
visibility, such as sending phone messages to the workforce at large or using
podcasts to broadcast messages from supervisors.
A solid
communication strategy is not just good for improving the ratings of senior
management; it also improves the overall well-being of a company because it
yields a more engaged workforce, Gochman explains. An engaged workforce can have
a positive impact on performance factors, such as productivity and the market
premium of a company.
“None of this is
rocket science,” Gochman says. “But for some reason companies don’t pay as much
attention as they should to developing a sound communication
strategy.”
--Gina Ruiz