The U.S. Supreme Court on Tuesday (January 16) declined to
review a federal appeals court ruling that IBM Corp.’s cash-balance pension plan
does not discriminate against older employees.
Chicago. The appeals court overturned a lower
court ruling that had said IBM’s plan created in 1999 discriminated against
older employees because, when expressed as a retirement annuity, the benefit
earned by younger employees is more valuable than the same benefit earned by
older employees.
But the appeals court—the first time a court of that level
ruled on the issue—rejected that analysis, saying the benefit-value disparity
was the result of the time value of money, not age discrimination.
The Supreme Court’s refusal to review the appeals court
ruling is not surprising. Certain factors, such as a split between appeals
courts or the involvement of the U.S. government, that increase the
likelihood of high court review were not present in the IBM cash-balance plan
litigation.
In 2004, a year after U.S. District Judge G. Patrick Murphy
found the IBM plan age discriminatory, IBM and the plaintiffs agreed to a
partial settlement. As part of that settlement, IBM agreed to pay $1.4 billion,
in the form of enhanced benefits, if it lost its appeal of Judge Murphy’s
ruling.
While IBM has prevailed in the litigation, the age
discrimination issue around cash-balance plans remains unsettled, with numerous
district courts handing down conflicting rulings. More certainty isn’t likely
until several more appeals courts rule on the issue or the Supreme Court, in
another case, decides to take up the issue.
A 2006 federal law does protect cash-balance plans that meet
certain basic standards from age discrimination suits. But that law, the Pension
Protection Act, applies only to cash-balance plans established after June 29,
2005.
Roughly 1,200 to 1,500 employers now sponsor cash-balance
plans, which are so named because benefits are expressed as a cash lump sum.
Not directly related to the litigation, IBM, like several
other major U.S. employers, is phasing out its
cash=balance plan in favor of an enhanced 401(k) plan.
—Jerry Geisel
Jerry Geisel is a reporter for Business Insurance, a sister
publication of Workforce Management.