Companies that have run out of simple ways to reduce health
care costs may have one last option before deciding whether to make long-term
commitments to health care programs or get out of health care benefits
altogether: co-insurance.
Co-insurance, which divides the cost of health services
between the employer and the employee, is becoming more commonly used to replace
co-pays for doctor visits, prescription drugs and other services, says James
Winkler, practice leader of Hewitt’s health management consulting
practice.
“Co-insurance is a way of introducing mini-consumerism,” he
says.
By not paying a fixed dollar amount, employees will know how
much their health care costs. And by paying a percentage of the total, consumers
will be interested in finding lower-cost providers.
There are few simple options remaining to reduce health care
costs. Employers are increasingly looking at developing more aggressive and
longer-term health care strategies aimed at improving the health of employees
and the quality of health care while also reducing costs.
A Hewitt study released Thursday (April 19) of 450 large U.S. employers who cover more than
8 million employees, shows that 63 percent of employers surveyed will look to
increase education efforts, hold employees accountable for their health care
costs and use various technologies to cull and analyze health data so they can
anticipate ways to manage costly chronic illnesses.
More companies are enrolling employees into disease management programs by
offering incentives like reduced premiums and copays for doctors’ visits and
prescriptions.
The pace of rising health care costs has slowed to about 8
percent in 2007, thanks in large part to employers shifting costs to employees
by raising premiums and co-pays and introducing higher
deductibles.
But employers worry that continuing to shift costs will brew
an employee backlash and, in the long term, do little to stem the chronic
illnesses that are at the foundation of exorbitant costs.
Instead, employers are “looking beyond cost shifting and plan
to invest more in the health and welfare of their employees,” the study’s
authors wrote.
At the heart of the effort is getting employees more involved
in their health and making them sensitive to health care costs, Winkler says.
Companies are doing so by offering account-based health plans and creating
incentives to go to the best and most cost-efficient doctors who follow widely
accepted standards of medical practice for certain diseases.
Companies are less willing to focus on providing financial
incentives to doctors who perform better than their peers.
Despite having a long-term approach, benefit managers must
still prove cost savings in the short term, which Winkler defined as one to
three years. Additionally, 37 percent plan to mitigate costs through changes in
benefit design on an annual basis. For them, there are few easy options
left.
Thus enter co-insurance and other short-term ways to reduce
health care costs. These strategies include marking up premiums and then
offering discounts to people who have healthier lifestyles or enroll in smoking
cessation and weight loss programs. Winkler calls these “self-funded incentives”
because they do not require extra money. Some employers have also chosen to pay
the incentives into health reimbursement accounts to avoid taxes and to make
sure the savings go toward paying for health care expenses.
Some employers may resist making long-term investments during
the coming election year since health care policy may undergo major changes
federally or, in the absence of action in Washington, within individual states, Winkler
says.
“Large employers fear state reform that can play out in 50
different ways more than they do federal reform,” he says.
Winkler says none of the benefit managers interviewed said
their company planned to get out of health care benefits, which surprised him.
But, he adds, “those who choose the exit ramp [and get out of health care
benefits] may well choose themselves out of a job,” a factor that may have
skewed results.
CEOs, on the other hand, have expressed interest in getting
out of health benefits, but none have yet been so bold as to follow through on
that sentiment, saying. “ ‘I will gladly be second,’ ” Winkler
says.
—Jeremy Smerd, Workforce Management staff writer