Relocation specialists battling rising property inventories
and flattening home prices are creating measures to keep costs in check and
shield themselves from shifts in an uncertain real estate market.
A recent Weichert Relocation Resources Inc. study of 106 U.S.
and Canadian companies, the bulk of which have at least 5,000 employees and
approve more than 100 employee moves per year, reveals that the days when
relocating employees made most real estate marketing decisions are dwindling,
says Ellie Sullivan of Morris Plains, New Jersey-based Weichert. Employees could
select any real estate broker, but that’s no longer the case, Sullivan says.
More than 60 percent of survey respondents say they require employees to list
their properties with company-approved brokers.
Employees who don’t adhere to these terms run the risk of
having to pay out of pocket.
“It is similar to the concept used by HMOs,”
Sullivan says. “If you use a health care provider that’s out of network, then
you are out of luck.”
Companies adopted this practice in response to financial
losses they incurred over the years when employees too often selected a broker
who wasn’t qualified for the job. “It gives companies greater quality control
over the type of real estate expert that employees use.”
Companies have imposed other limitations. Approximately 60
percent of survey participants say they place restrictions on listing prices.
Within this group, 34 percent require the initial list price to be no more than
105 percent of the real estate broker’s appraised value. Further, 70 percent of
those participants say they require employees to market their homes for a
defined minimum period of time.
“The conversations being held about relocation are similar to
those circling around health care costs,” Sullivan says. “There is a need for
greater control and greater education.” Yet, there is more support and
infrastructure to help employees cope with a move. Many companies offer
relocation counseling so workers are better equipped to handle the complex real
estate component that’s involved in a transfer.
This is a smart measure, Sullivan says, because botched real
estate deals can be costly—to the company as well as the employee. Almost 70
percent of the employers participating in the survey say they provide
loss-on-sale assistance, with caps ranging from $10,000 to
$275,000.
Sullivan doesn’t believe rising costs will significantly
deter employee relocation, even when it involves midlevel managers or
entry-level employees.
“There may be fluctuations in activity,” Sullivan says, “but
the need of transferring is too significant to halt completely.”
—Gina
Ruiz