IBM has launched a new
program to help its employees upgrade their skills and broaden their perspective
so that they can do individually what the company as a whole has been doing for
years—compete in the global economy.
In
an early evening speech Wednesday, July 25, in Washington, IBM chief executive Samuel J.
Palmisano announced that the firm has established individual training and
education accounts for employees with at least five years of
service.
An IBM worker can put as
much as $1,000 annually into the portable account, which would be similar to a
401(k) retirement fund. The company will make a 50 percent match on the employee
contribution.
The accounts are one
element of what IBM calls its Global Citizen’s Portfolio, a three-year, $60
million initiative designed to help employees bolster their skills and careers.
Another component is a
leadership development program that will bring together IBM staff from around
the world to tackle problems in developing countries in partnership with
nongovernmental organizations.
The final piece of the
program, called enhanced transition services, will help IBM employees find
second careers in government, nonprofit, educational and economic development
organizations when they leave the company.
Palmisano’s goal is to
give IBM employees more agility in adjusting to global economic
demands.
“To be competitive, any
individual—like any company, community or country—has to adapt continuously,
learning new fields and new skills,” Palmisano said at an IBM conference on
global leadership. “We’ve set off down the path of empowering and enabling our
people to make decisions and to act. We call this lowering the center of gravity
of the company … pushing decision-making authority out and down.”
Giving employees more
control over their training and career direction will increase their engagement,
according to Palmisano.
“We believe that this
kind of program will help us attract the smartest and most creative workforce,”
he says.
IBM requires high-caliber
people as it transforms itself from a traditional multinational company, with
country-specific operations, to a “globally integrated enterprise,” Palmisano
says.
“We used to have separate
supply chains in different markets,” he says. “Now we have one supply chain, a global
one. Where we used to think about our human capital—our people—in terms of
countries and regions and business units, we now manage and deploy them as one
global asset.”
But millions of workers
around the world aren’t being deployed in the global economy—they’re being
deactivated. IBM is hosting the Washington conference in part to address fears
about diminishing income and job prospects that are becoming rampant in both
developed and emerging economies.
One way to address the
anxiety is to weave a stronger safety net to help workers bounce back when they
lose their jobs, says C. Fred Bergsten, director of the Peterson Institute for
International Economics in Washington. The organization is helping
sponsor the forum.
Ideas that Bergsten
promotes include wage insurance, portable health insurance and pensions, and
trade adjustment assistance.
These programs help
workers absorb the impact of global competition. “The hit will not be so acute,
will not be so damaging,” Bergsten says. “We are going to have to do
more.”
Beyond paying attention
to those left behind, advocates for the global economy need to do a better job
explaining its benefits, according to conference participants.
For instance, IBM is just
as likely to place an operation in the U.S. as it is to locate it in India,
Palmisano says. Lowering costs is only one factor in the decision. Local labor
market skills and infrastructure are also key.
“The important thing is
we’re trying to have this integration of competency and value,” Palmisano says.
As countries develop
those traits, they have to remain globally engaged. “Economies grow faster if
they’re more integrated and open,” says Timothy Geithner, president and CEO of
the Federal Reserve Bank of New
York.
Economic gains are also
spread more broadly over time, Geithner says.
Palmisano asserted that
companies have to articulate such arguments. “If we don’t make the case, the
case will be made for us,” he says. “And we won’t like the
outcome.”
To avoid that result,
Palmisano proposed changing negative attitudes.“The most productive way to
think about this—both for business growth and for societal health—is not ‘What
will globalization do to me?’ Rather, it’s ‘How can I get work and investment to
flow to me?’ "
—Mark Schoeff Jr.