San Francisco regulators have provided further guidance on how to comply with
a controversial ordinance that imposes a health care spending requirement on
employers.
The latest guidance, which was issued in response to questions from
employers, clarifies how much employees must earn in order for them to qualify
as exempt employees, for whom employers do not have to make the required
contributions.
Under the law, which was passed in 2006, employers with at least 100
employees must make in 2008 a health care contribution of $1.76 per hour per
covered employee, while employers with 20 to 99 employees must make a
contribution of $1.17 per hour per covered employee. Employers with fewer than
20 employees are excluded from the spending mandate.
The law, which went into effect earlier this year pending the outcome of a
challenge in the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, gives employers a choice of
several options—such as payment of group health insurance premiums or
contributions to employees’ health savings accounts—to satisfy the spending
contribution requirement.
The spending requirement, though, does not apply to several categories of
exempt employees, including those managers and supervisors earning more than
$76,851 in 2008.
In the latest guidance, San Francisco regulators said the $76,851 figure
refers to individuals’ base salary and that bonuses and overtime should be
excluded in determining whether the employee has hit the cutoff.
Additionally, regulators say the $76,851 annual earnings figure applies not
only to compensation actually earned, but also to entitled salary.
For example, an employee hired as a manager in December and who has a base
annual salary of $120,000 would be excluded in employer calculations even though
the individual would have earned only $10,000 for that employer in 2008.
Filed by Jerry Geisel of Business Insurance, a sister publication of
Workforce Management. To comment, e-mail editors@workforcecom.
Workforce Management's online news feed is now available via Twitter.