When a bill weighs in at $787 billion, it’s hard to imagine anything being
left out. But a provision that would have required companies receiving stimulus
funding to sign up for a government-run electronic worker verification system
was scuttled during House-Senate negotiations.
The measure could have increased the number of firms, especially in the
construction industry, using the system. About 87,000 employers have signed up
for the voluntary program, known as E-Verify, which checks new-hire information
from I-9 forms against Social Security and Department of Homeland Security
databases.
The author of the bill that established E-Verify was angry that it did not
survive in the stimulus package.
“There is no assurance that the jobs created will go to American workers,”
Rep. Ken Calvert, R-California, said on the House floor. He asserted that
E-Verify was “stripped out of the bill without discussion or debate.”
Employer groups were relieved by the outcome. They have long criticized the
system for being inaccurate, inefficient and unable to detect identity theft.
Despite its stimulus demise, E-Verify will remain on the congressional radar.
The program is due to expire March 6. A separate provision that would have
reauthorized it also was struck from the stimulus package.
But Congress will probably find a way to maintain the program until it can be
addressed as part of a larger immigration bill, according to Hector Chichoni, a
partner at Epstein Becker Green in Miami.
“It was removed [from stimulus] because it is going to come up in the same or
similar form later in the year,” Chichoni said.
E-Verify proponents say the system confirms 96 percent of queries instantly
and has an error rate of less than 1 percent. Employer advocates argue that the
4.1 percent error rate in the Social Security database could lead to millions of
people being incorrectly ruled ineligible for work.
After the failure of comprehensive immigration reform in 2007, the Bush
administration made E-Verify—and work-site enforcement generally—a central
component of its battle against illegal immigration.
The Obama administration is likely to continue to support E-Verify, according
to Chichoni.
“It’s the best the government can do,” Chichoni said. “They will never
abandon this.”
But the government will now take a different approach to
enforcement.
“They’re changing the strategy,” Chichoni said. “They’re going after the
employer rather than going after the undocumented.”
It’s hard to predict when Washington will turn its attention to immigration
reform. It was highlighted by Senate Democratic leaders as one of the items at
the top of their agenda.
But the collapsing economy has been the focus of Capitol Hill so far. In the
meantime, it’s not just E-Verify that will be in limbo. Technology companies
probably won’t get the increase in employment visas that they covet.
Paul Otellini, president and CEO of Intel, expects that piecemeal immigration
concerns will have to wait until Congress takes on comprehensive reform.
“It will all be dealt with at once,” he told reporters after a speech in
Washington in early February. “I don’t see [immigration] being a big priority.
They have bigger fish to fry.”
—Mark Schoeff Jr.
Workforce
Management’s online news feed is now available via Twitter.