News in Brief
Home
Complete archive of features and news articles, sample policies and procedures, assessments, and surveys.
Network and exchange ideas with other members in the forums or ask an expert in one of the hosted forums.
Access vendor directories, product case studies and showcases.
Read Best in Shows, view our conference calendar, read commentaries and take our news poll.
The Hot List
Blogs
Topic Channels
Comp, Benefits, Rewards
HR Management
Legal Insight
Recruiting and Staffing
Software and Technology
Training and Development
= Member Only
Workforce HR Jobs
Find A Job
Post A Job



Subscribe Now
Workforce Magazine
Subscriber Help
























= Member Only


News in Brief: Bank of America Accused of Gender Discrimination at Merrill Lynch
  

Bank of America Accused of Gender Discrimination at Merrill Lynch
Bank of America finds itself back in hot water over retention bonuses at its recently acquired Merrill Lynch unit. Furor is being raised by female employees who say they received much smaller bonus checks than their male colleagues.
Comments 0 | Recommend 0
July 10, 2009
Bank of America Accused of Gender Discrimination at Merrill Lynch
Bank of America finds itself back in hot water over retention bonuses at its recently acquired Merrill Lynch unit. This time the furor is being raised by female employees at the firm who say they received much smaller bonus checks than their male colleagues.

Jamie Goodman, a financial advisor and 16-year veteran of Merrill Lynch, has filed a class-action sexual discrimination suit against the brokerage firm and parent company Bank of America.

The case, filed in late June, asserts that BofA knew of Merrill’s allegedly discriminatory pay practices yet calculated bonuses based on Merrill data anyway. The suit seeks unspecified damages.

“When it comes to layoffs or retention bonuses, we’re seeing that the [negative] impact is much greater on women,” said Shona Glink, partner at law firm Meites Mulder Mollica & Glink, which is handling Goodman’s class-action case.

When these big firms merge, women are being paid less to stay because their production is lower,” Glink explained. “And why is their production lower? Because they’ve been discriminated against by not getting the good partnership opportunities, the big clients or the large territories. It’s a vicious cycle.”

Gender discrimination claims on Wall Street are nothing new.

Indeed, the National Council of Women’s Organizations established its Women on Wall Street Project in 2004 to address the issue. But recent years have seen a lull in such claims. The last time Merrill Lynch faced a high-profile sexual discrimination suit was in 2004.

Now that thousands of Wall Streeters are losing their jobs, however, such complaints are on the rise. Gender discrimination claims jumped by nearly 15 percent last year, according to the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission.

The past two months have brought a drastic jump in the number of calls from women in corporate settings, said Martha Burk, director of the council’s Corporate Accountability Project. She normally gets three such calls per month, but so far in July she has already received calls from 13 women.

“And keep in mind that when I’m talking to one woman, she may be calling on behalf of 10 others,” Burk said. “Informally, we believe that companies think the recession is going to give them cover against causes of action.”

When Bank of America acquired Merrill Lynch in September, it said it would pay retention bonuses to Merrill’s financial advisors based on commissions.

The problem is, Goodman charges, “women were excluded from significant income earning opportunities” at Merrill Lynch, keeping their commissions artificially low. In addition, she alleges that even the few women who made it into the high-earning brackets, such as herself, “were disproportionately denied retention bonuses or received lower bonuses” than their male counterparts.

Bank of America issued a statement saying it would vigorously defend itself, insisting that bonuses were merit-based and objectively calculated. It said the bank does not tolerate discrimination.

In recent years, brokerage firms have been fighting gender discrimination cases with mixed results. In 2004, Merrill fought a $14.6 million sexual discrimination case brought against the firm’s London office by a female financial advisor.

The court ruled in favor of the brokerage firm, confirming that her firing was not gender-based, though it did scold Merrill for a “bullying” environment, and awarded the former advisor $100,000.

Morgan Stanley didn’t fare as well that year.

The firm settled a sex discrimination case with the EEOC for $54 million a day before the trial was due to wrap up.

And more recently, in 2006, Dresdner Kleinwort Wasserstein fought a $1.4 billion sex discrimination suit brought by six female bankers, and retaliated with a countersuit charging the women with “courting publicity” and trying to “smear the firm’s reputation.” The case was ultimately settled out of court.


Filed by Hilary Potkewitz of Crain’s New York Business, a sister publication of Workforce Management. To comment, e-mail editors@workforce.com.

Workforce Management's online news feed is now available via Twitter

 


News in Brief Archive

Comments

Guidelines: Comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. We will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. You are fully responsible for the content you post.





Subscribe to Workforce Management

If you enjoy the content on the Workforce Management Web site and want to see more, try 3 issues of our print edition risk-free. If you wish to continue, you will receive one full year for just $79. That's over 59% off the cover price. If you decide Workforce Management is not for you, just write "Cancel" on the invoice, return it and owe nothing. The 3 issues are yours to keep with no further obligation to us. Sign up below.

3 Free Issues

Name:
E-mail:
Company:
Address:
City:  State:
Zip/Postal Code:  Country:
  
Offer valid for new Workforce Management Subscribers only.
Canada subscribers - $129. All other Foreign - $199.



Sponsored Tools
Eliminate performance review headaches
Free eGuide: Learn the secret of more effective, no-hassle performance reviews
Applicant Tracking Made Easy
PCRecruiter is the ATS of Choice for Organizations Worldwide. FREE Demo
Comply with HR Regulations Easily by using TriNet
PEO solutions for a tough economy: request a free info kit! Serving the US and Canada since 1988.
Talent Management for the 21st Century
Register to download this Harvard Business Review article.
Ethics Training Your Company Needs Right Now!
Truly effective ethics training does so much more than simply teach the rules. Your employees also need real-world skills in applying those rules. Bauer Ethics Seminars give employees the tools they need to really 'walk the talk' of great ethics!





Similar Documents

Related Topics









Copyright © 1995- Crain Communications Inc.
All Rights Reserved. Terms of Use Privacy Statement