News in Brief
Home
Complete archive of features and news articles, sample policies and procedures, assessments, and surveys.
Network and exchange ideas with other members in the forums or ask an expert in one of the hosted forums.
Access vendor directories, product case studies and showcases.
Read Best in Shows, view our conference calendar, read commentaries and take our news poll.
The Hot List
Blogs
Topic Channels
Comp, Benefits, Rewards
HR Management
Legal Insight
Recruiting and Staffing
Software and Technology
Training and Development
= Member Only
Workforce HR Jobs
Find A Job
Post A Job



Subscribe Now
Workforce Magazine
Subscriber Help
























= Member Only


News in Brief: California Appeals Court Rules History of Accommodation Not a Legal Shield for Employer
  

California Appeals Court Rules History of Accommodation Not a Legal Shield for Employer
Despite a lengthy pattern of accommodating a disabled employee, a single failure to accommodate the worker violated California’s anti-discrimination law, a state appeals court ruled in a decision published Thursday, October 15.
Comments 0 | Recommend 0
October 16, 2009
California Appeals Court Rules History of Accommodation Not a Legal Shield for Employer

Despite a lengthy pattern of accommodating a disabled employee, a single failure to accommodate the worker violated California’s anti-discrimination law, a state appeals court ruled in a decision published Thursday, October 15.

Court records in A.M. v. Albertsons L.L.C. show a grocery store checker sued Albertsons in 2006 for a failure to accommodate her disability. She later amended her complaint to allege a violation of California’s Fair Employment and Housing Act. In 2008, a jury found the retail grocer failed to accommodate and awarded the plaintiff $200,000.

Five years earlier, the employee underwent chemotherapy and radiation treatment for cancer. The treatment affected her salivary glands, causing her to drink large volumes of water and urinate frequently, court records show.

Among other measures, Albertsons accommodated her during several months by allowing her to keep water at her work station despite a prohibition against it, and managers covered for her when she needed a bathroom break.

In 2005, a new supervisor began working at the store.

The supervisor was unfamiliar with the employee’s disability and failed to cover for her despite several desperate requests to leave her station, court records show. Unable to control herself, the worker urinated while standing at the register, court records show. As a result, she became withdrawn and suffered from depression, among other problems.

Albertsons argued that its 2005 failure to accommodate was trivial because it constituted a single incident in the context of a much greater period of successful accommodation beginning in 2004. But the appeals court called that interpretation inconsistent with FEHA because the statute “does not speak of a pattern of failure.”

“As is demonstrated by [this case], a single failure to make reasonable accommodation can have tragic consequences for an employee who is not accommodated,” the court ruled.

The appeals court affirmed the lower court’s decision.


Filed by Roberto Ceniceros of Business Insurance, a sister publication of Workforce Management. To comment, e-mail editors@workforce.com.

Stay informed and connected. Get human resources news and HR features via Workforce Management’s Twitter feed or RSS feeds for mobile devices and news readers.

 


News in Brief Archive

Comments

Guidelines: Comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. We will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. You are fully responsible for the content you post.





Subscribe to Workforce Management

If you enjoy the content on the Workforce Management Web site and want to see more, try 3 issues of our print edition risk-free. If you wish to continue, you will receive one full year for just $79. That's over 59% off the cover price. If you decide Workforce Management is not for you, just write "Cancel" on the invoice, return it and owe nothing. The 3 issues are yours to keep with no further obligation to us. Sign up below.

3 Free Issues

Name:
E-mail:
Company:
Address:
City:  State:
Zip/Postal Code:  Country:
  
Offer valid for new Workforce Management Subscribers only.
Canada subscribers - $129. All other Foreign - $199.



Sponsored Tools
Eliminate performance review headaches
Free eGuide: Learn the secret of more effective, no-hassle performance reviews
Quickly Comply with HR Regulations using TriNet
Total HR solutions designed for growing companies; Serving the U.S. and Canada.
Unique, Powerful Values-Based Ethics Programs!
Bauer Ethics Seminars focus on core values and how your employees can clarify and harness those values to reduce their risk of ethics problems. Move your ethics training program to the next level with great skills for making better decisions!
HR Management Certification
Choose a School, Request More Info, Start Earning Your Certification!
Free e-Signature Site
Try it Now - It Only Takes Seconds! Used by Fortune 500 and Worldwide. Send & Sign Documents Online.





Similar Documents

Related Topics









Copyright © 1995- Crain Communications Inc.
All Rights Reserved. Terms of Use Privacy Statement