Large-scale individual mandates aren’t necessarily the most effective way
to get people to enroll in health insurance, a panel of experts said Monday,
October 26, during a meeting of the Congressional Health Care Caucus.
Such a mandate, which is under consideration as a component of health care
reform, “is problematic in a free society” and wouldn’t necessarily have a 100
percent success rate, said Rep. Michael Burgess, R-Texas, who chairs the
caucus.
The Internal Revenue Service, for example, mandates that all citizens pay
taxes, “but 15 percent of the population don’t comply,” he said.
To address the problem of people with pre-existing conditions, Douglas
Holtz-Eakin, president of DHE Consulting, proposed the idea of portable
insurance policies that would offer coverage regardless of employment or medical
history, and carry over into an individual’s retirement.
A brief “open enrollment” period when individuals could sign up for
guaranteed coverage would be another alternative to a “draconian mandate,” he
said.
Janet Trautwein, CEO of the National Association of Health Underwriters,
suggested that automatic enrollment, successfully used in 401(k) programs, could
be made available through the proposed insurance exchanges in the respective
health care reform bills, perhaps coupled with late enrollment penalties.
As a result, insurance pools would grow, “bringing down costs for employers,”
she said.
Filed by Jennifer Lubell of Modern
Healthcare, a sister publication of Workforce
Management. To comment, e-mail editors@workforce.com.
Stay informed and connected.
Get human resources news and HR features via Workforce Management’s Twitter feed
or RSS feeds for mobile devices and news
readers.