 |
Lessons from September 11
The terrorist attacks served to remind employers of the importance of taking care of certain basic HR issues.
he terrorist attacks of September 11 have had little lasting impact on the
workplaces of companies that were not directly affected. This doesn’t mean,
however, that there aren’t HR lessons to be learned from the event. In fact,
what the terrorist attacks did do was remind employers of the importance of
taking care of certain basic HR issues, as well as being prepared for workplace
emergencies. Some of the issues that have risen to the surface are:
Employee safety and security. "If employers don’t pay attention to
safety and security issues, there is the possibility for lawsuits regarding
negligent hiring, supervision, and good old-fashioned negligence," says
attorney Roger Brice, partner and head of the labor and employment group at
Sonnenschein, Nath and Rosenthal in Chicago. "There is a general duty clause
in OSHA that says that employers have to provide workplaces that are free of
recognized hazards that could cause harm to employees. In light of 9/11, if
employers don’t take some heightened security precautions and bad things
happen, they can be subject to liability."
Interestingly enough, when it comes to security, Brice believes that today’s
employees tend to be much more accepting of things they would have considered
intrusions two years ago. This includes e-mail and voice-mail monitoring and the
use of security badges and metal detectors.
Succession planning. The fact that so many people were killed on September
11 while at work underscores the importance of succession planning and the need
for organizations to have already identified leaders who can step into key roles
on short notice.
"Companies cannot afford to have small numbers of people with skill sets
that are not shared by others," says Paul Ofman, a consultant with RHR
International in New York.
Policies regarding business travel. Employers have to determine what they
will do with employees who are afraid to fly even though their jobs may require
travel. If the fear is clinically based, it may be a covered disability under
the ADA, and employers would have to make reasonable accommodations.
Military leave. HR must inform supervisors that employees have a right to
military leave. By law, employees who are members of the military reserve must
be granted leaves of absence on request. If the leaves of absence are for less
than 91 days, the returning employees must be re-employed in the positions they
would have had if the employment had not been interrupted by military service.
If the leaves are longer, the returning employees must be reinstated to the
positions they would have had or similar positions in terms of seniority,
status, and pay.
Crisis planning. According to Arthur F. Silbergeld, a partner in
the Los Angeles office of Proskauer Rose LLP, human resources departments should
review and update their crisis and evacuation plans, and establish plans to provide
employees with food and shelter for up to 72 hours in the event of a disaster
that prevents them from leaving the premises.
Employee communication. In uncertain times -- whether because of a
terrorist attack or a declining economy -- employees need communication from
management more than ever. "HR executives need to be mindful that it is their
job to connect the dots for employees," Ofman says. They have to demonstrate
to employees why their jobs are still relevant in order to re-establish
enthusiasm and commitment.
Employee-assistance plans. The counseling resources available through
employee-assistance programs were used heavily in the weeks after September 11.
According to a study by ComPsych, a company that manages workplace
employee-assistance programs, one out of five employees who’d previously used
their company’s EAP used it following September 11, and an additional 11
percent of employees began to view EAP services with renewed respect.
One of the problems experienced by some companies with EAPs was that
information about use of these services didn’t always make it to the senior
leaders who tend not to be well-informed about how people are feeling and
reacting to crisis.
Workforce, March 2002, p. 38 -- Subscribe Now!
|
 |