ome companies use exit interviews to monitor the effectiveness of
work/life-balance programs. Michael Scheidemann, assistant director of
recruiting at Cap Gemini Ernst & Young, says it is a "key communication
link about why someone is leaving. It is a well-documented conversation. We
compile the results and review them monthly. When you start seeing trends,
whether it’s a particular supervisor or a recurring theme such as travel, it
is an indicator that builds awareness of the issues. Especially if it’s a
highly rated employee, it is doubly important."
The FutureWork Institute’s Joseph Gibbons believes, however, that the
information gleaned from exit interviews is not reliable. "People will say
whatever it takes to get them out the door without being tripped up," he says.
"We are doing post-exit interviews, conducted one year later, and they produce
much more honest results. The results are often so volatile that they almost
have to be printed on asbestos." When FutureWork reports the findings to
senior management, "the responses range from the firm that put the results on
a shelf to another where the CEO called in his people and said, ‘I want this
problem fixed within a week and that one fixed within a month.’"
Catalyst also conducts post-exit interviews for companies. "They are
extremely important for educating senior management," says Marcia Brumit Kropf,
vice president for research and information services. "Often, what we find is
myth-breaking. For example, many women say they are leaving the company to spend
more time with their families, but one year later, they are working someplace
else. At one firm, women often left after seven or eight years, and there was
much higher turnover among women. The firm was forced to pick partners from a
much smaller pool than the leadership wanted, and they had rationalized it as
‘they are all going home to be with their families.’ When they discovered
that the women were working somewhere else, it was a shock."
Workforce, December 2002, p. 37 -- Subscribe Now!