 |
The Mixed Message of Long-term-care Coverage
Some employees want employers to offer coverage. But others balk at the price tag--and the spectre of mortality.
By Cindy Waxer
ary Grey didn’t need to hear a long-winded pitch from a smooth-talking insurance
salesman to decide that he should purchase a long-term-care policy. Witnessing
his elderly mother’s medical plight was convincing enough for the former
aerospace engineer from Granada Hills, California.
In June 1998, a complicated hip-replacement procedure left
Grey’s mother, Sarah, incapable of walking without aid and in desperate need of
round-the-clock care. Fortunately, Sarah had the foresight to purchase a
long-term-care policy 10 years earlier, at the age of 77. The insurance paid
$120 a day for a live-in nurse for more than three years, until Sarah’s death,
an expense totaling more than $150,000. "It was a godsend," says Grey, who
purchased his own long-term-care insurance as well as a policy for his wife soon
after his mother’s death.
Grey is just one of a growing number of Americans who are
beginning to confront the problems and costs of aging, and buying or considering
LTCI. And corporate America is starting to listen. A recent report by the
American Council of Life Insurers says that more than a third of companies with
5,000 or more employees now offer LTCI, as do a quarter of midsize firms and at
least 22 state governments. It doesn’t cost businesses anything to offer LTCI to
their employees. Yet employees who sign up for a policy may eventually save
businesses a lot of money in lost productivity. Statistics show that one in four
employees cares for an elderly family member. The resulting lost productivity
and turnover cost businesses $29 billion a year, MetLife reports.
FedEx didn’t encounter any difficulties convincing its
employees of the benefits of LTCI. The transport behemoth began offering the
insurance in May 2001 through MetLife. To encourage employees to sign up, FedEx
mailed out brochures and had customer-service representatives available to field
questions. Today, 7,800 FedEx employees are enrolled and enjoy 10-year rate
guarantees and expanded family coverage that includes spouses, parents, in-laws
and children.
But FedEx’s decision to introduce its employees to LTCI
wasn’t entirely altruistic. As the company’s workforce began graying, the
difficulty of "having to care for aging parents was becoming an issue with many
employees," says Gus Lauer, FedEx’s managing director of health-care services.
By enabling workers to sign up for LTCI, Lauer says, FedEx hopes to maintain
business productivity, reduce absenteeism and eliminate workplace stress as an
increasing number of employees begin to care for their elderly parents.
"There is a productivity issue facing America, and it’s
going to continue to get worse [as more and more employees] have to provide for
their parents," Lauer says. Despite the pressing need for Americans to protect
their parents, and businesses their bottom lines, companies have found that some
employees simply aren’t ready to deal with the prospect of long-term care. While
a recent survey by the U.S. Chamber of Commerce found that 56 percent of all
workers are concerned about the need for this coverage, insurers have sold only
about 8 million LTCI policies nationwide. The hefty price tag is a significant
factor in the slow adoption rate.
"The reason people don't buy
long-term-care insurance is denial, absolutely denial."
|
While it’s possible to purchase LTCI
independently, there are benefits to group plans. Unlike individual policies,
group plans rarely ask employees to provide "evidence of insurability." Instead,
applicants are practically guaranteed coverage. It’s a precious perk, given that
rejection rates for LTCI policies can run as high as 30 percent, depending on an
applicant’s age, habits and medical history.
In the American Health Care Association’s most recent
report, 43 percent of people over age 65 are shown to be at risk of entering a
nursing home sometime in their lives. And the average daily rate for
nursing-home care is $168 for a private room and $143 for a semi-private room,
according to a 2001 MetLife market survey. Aging Americans can’t bank on
Medicare for help. While it will often cover short-term nursing care after a
hospital stay, Medicare doesn’t cover personal care or prolonged home care. LTCI
can offset these costs by reimbursing policyholders for all or some of the
expenses associated with professional care, including services provided by
nursing homes, assisted-living and adult-day-care facilities, and home-health
agencies.
The coverage doesn’t come cheap. A single policy for a
healthy 50-year-old employee can cost anywhere from $1,500 to $3,500 a year. A
70-year-old wishing to purchase a policy can expect to pay as much as $10,000 a
year. For this reason, experts recommend that people buy the policy when they
are in their mid-40s to mid-50s. Gary Grey and his wife, for example, purchased
their policies at age 60 and 56, respectively, and pay a combined total of
$7,000 a year. It’s a high price to pay for protecting one’s assets, but that
hasn’t stopped employees from asking companies to make LTCI available in the
workplace.
With 76 million baby boomers about to become senior
citizens, employees are insisting that employers offer easy access to LTCI
policies through carriers such as Prudential, John Hancock and MetLife.
Selecting an appropriate carrier and comparing policies can be a "daunting
undertaking" for an individual consumer, says Paula Wickland, a principal at the
employee-benefits firm Towers Perrin. Fortunately, Wickland says, employers can
simplify the process of selecting a carrier by conducting the necessary legwork
on behalf of employees. Businesses often are better equipped to negotiate policy
features such as premium prices, inflation protection and extended coverage.
This is especially important in the case of multi-year rate guarantees. The cost
of a nursing facility increases about 5 percent each year. A company can ensure
that an LTCI policy properly addresses these rate increases.
"You simply don’t have the leverage and the negotiating
power of an employer when you’re out there on your own in the individual
market," Wickland says.
Fear of aging also comes into play.
"The reason people don’t buy long-term-care insurance
is denial, absolutely denial," says Sandra Pierce-Miller, project director at
the California Partnership for Long-Term Care, a division of California’s
Department of Health Services.
David Ness knows how hard the sell can be. Ness is vice
president of compensation and benefits at Medtronic, a medical technology
provider in Minneapolis, which began offering LTCI in the fall of 2000 through
Prudential. To date, 615 employees have signed up for a policy, a meager 2 to 3
percent of Medtronic’s total eligible population. It’s a negligible number, but
one that Ness says is currently the industry norm. High premiums are a
disincentive. Then there is simply the lack of education surrounding LTCI. Many
workers are unaware of LTCI policies, the high price of home care, and how
insurance can ease the financial burden of caring for ailing loved ones.
Kathy Udavchak, an operations manager at Kodak in
Rochester, New York, who is in her 40s, says that before the company began
offering LTCI in early 1993, the words "long-term-care insurance" had never
crossed her lips. "If Kodak weren’t offering it, I wouldn’t have long-term-care
insurance right now," says Udavchak, who purchased a policy two years ago after
attending LTCI information sessions hosted by Kodak and prospective carriers.
Kodak automatically debits her annual premium payment of $948 from payroll, an
added convenience for those who purchase their policies at their place of
employment.
There’s no simple answer as to whether it’s up to
companies to better educate an aging workforce on LTCI or it’s incumbent on
workers to demand group-plan policies from corporate America. What is certain is
that employees cannot simply depend on Medicare’s generosity or wait for cheaper
premium prices or the perfect policy before making a move on LTCI.
Gary Grey is one who believes that the investment is well
worth the risk. "Long-term-care insurance is like any other insurance. You’ve
got to lose to win," he says. "It’s unfortunate, but it’s a fact of life."
Workforce Management, May 2004, pp. 63-65
-- Subscribe Now!
Cindy Waxer is a freelance writer based in Toronto. To comment, email editors@workforce.com.
Next Article: 1. Recruitment Effort Launched to Find Long-term Caregivers
A Cleveland group launches a $1.3 million recruitment effort to entice people to work with the elderly.
Features Archive
|
 |
|
Workforce Blogs |
|
The Business of Management
Workforce Management editor John Hollon analyzes and comments on business, management and the art of leading a workforce.
|
|
Workforce Washington
Washington staff writer Mark Schoeff Jr. provides an insider’s insights to the workings of our nation’s capital from the workforce management perspective.
|
|
Global Work Watch
Staff writer Ed Frauenheim blogs about how companies worldwide marshal and manage their workers.
|
|