Some companies are advancing the telephone from a referral tool to a way to deliver therapy. Proponents say it’s an efficient, effective way to deal with all but the most serious mental-health issues, but critics say it’s untested and is offered only to curb costs.
By Michelle V. Rafter Comments 0 | Recommend 0
he
telephone has long been a supporting player in employee assistance programs. For
years, companies have relied on toll-free hotlines staffed 24/7 to field
employees’ calls about job stress, divorce, addiction and other problems, and
then refer them to the appropriate professionals for face-to-face help.
More recently, the phone has graduated to a starring role,
as some companies advance from using it as a referral tool to integrating
telephone therapy into their EAP-based work/life and mental-health offerings. In
what’s been dubbed teletherapy or telecounseling, instead of an office visit,
mental-health professionals working in off-site call centers conduct counseling
sessions with employees who phone in from home, the office or the road. All but
the most serious problems--such as severe addiction or depression--are being
dealt with this way, through one-time or multiple, long-term phone sessions.
Most teletherapy offerings, which can also include e-mail and Internet-based
help, come from third-party EAP vendors or managed-care companies, which the
vast majority of Fortune 1000 companies contract with to provide EAP
services.
The development isn’t without controversy. Opinions are
strongly divided over the effectiveness of teletherapy and the motives for
offering it. Proponents claim that phone-based counseling gives people faster
access to help, leading to higher usage and success rates, and ultimately
increased worker productivity. They say it’s especially well suited to companies
with workers in rural areas underserved by mental-health professionals, or
businesses with employees who travel or are spread across the country.
But opponents claim that without face-to-face interaction,
it’s easier to miss or misdiagnose problems. They’re troubled by confidentiality
and licensing questions surrounding phone-based therapy, and point to the lack
of empirical evidence to support outside EAP vendors’ claims of success. They
maintain that because most outside contractors are paid a set amount per
employee per year regardless of use, vendors offer teletherapy because it’s
cheaper, and lower costs translate to higher profits. Companies "are being sold
a bill of goods that the telephone is as good as in person," says David Sharar,
a self-styled industry watchdog. "My argument is it should be an adjunct, not a
replacement."
In many cases, changes are occurring beneath the radar of
corporate human resources departments. Proponents and critics alike agree that
many human resources managers don’t keep abreast of changes in the delivery of
EAP services. "You’ll find companies that don’t know that it’s a problem," says
Sharar, managing director of the EAP division of Chestnut Health Systems in
Bloomington, Illinois.
But teletherapy backers say that human resources managers
care more about having services available and getting positive outcomes than how
the services are offered. "I really haven’t been with any clients that have
proposed we go with one over the other," says Chuck Taylor, executive vice
president of the employer solutions division of ValueOptions in Norfolk,
Virginia, a top EAP outsourcer.
Some of the uncertainties surrounding the treatment method
are being addressed. A trickle of scientific research is making its way into
publication. At least one EAP trade association is updating practice standards
to include specific guidelines for teletherapy.
Meanwhile, the debate isn’t stopping vendors from rolling
out the next generation of teletherapy services, in which e-mail and Web-based
counseling play an even larger role in treating things like diabetes, obesity
and smoking.
A convert at Bridgestone Ron Tepner was one of the skeptics. As vice president of
human resources at BFS Retail and Commercial Operations LLC, an arm of
Japanese-based Bridgestone Corp., Tepner provides EAP to 22,000 employees in
2,000 Bridgestone tire stores throughout the country. Traditionally, Bridgestone
paid for employees to receive in-office counseling through the company’s
medical-benefit plan. "I thought you needed to sit down to talk to someone or
lie on a couch somewhere," Tepner says. But the service was expensive. Employees
weren’t inclined to use it because they didn’t want someone in human resources
to know they had a problem, didn’t want to wait days or weeks for an
appointment, or, in smaller communities, didn’t want their cars seen in the
parking lot of the town psychologist, Tepner says.
About eight years ago, he heard about a telephone-based
EAP outsourcer being used by Wal-Mart and Kroger. Tepner arranged for a tour of
the call center run by the two-year-old company, Resources for Living (RFL), in
Austin, Texas. He quickly warmed to the concept of teletherapy, viewing it as a
means of helping employees faster and reducing costs.
The change paid off. Once teletherapy was introduced, EAP
use jumped 70 percent, according to statistics that RFL compiles for
Bridgestone. About 9.6 percent of employees call in during a given year,
amounting to approximately 1,500 calls. Family or personal issues make up 40
percent of the calls; emotional issues, 17.9 percent; work/life balance, 17.6
percent; risk-related issues such as workplace violence or harassment, 15.1
percent; and work-related issues such as trouble with managers or coworkers, 9
percent. According to RFL officials, calls average 26 minutes, though some, such
as marriage-counseling sessions, run up to 90 minutes. "I found out that 90
percent, maybe more, of everyone who calls in needs immediate attention," Tepner
says.
Before teletherapy was introduced, Bridgestone’s EAP
effectiveness--described as the percentage of people who get better--was 30
percent to 50 percent, typical for face-to-face outpatient therapy, according to
Mary Beth Chalk, RFL’s chief operating officer. Today, Bridgestone’s EAP success
rate runs about 92 percent, Chalk says. Much of the increase has come in the
past two years, after RFL introduced software that enables its 75 call-center
counselors to predict by the second call whether a given individual will respond
to teletherapy. If not, the person is referred to a face-to-face therapist.
There’s no question that teletherapy has cut costs. In the
first year, Bridgestone’s EAP costs dropped 25 percent to 30 percent, even with
higher usage, Chalk says. Tepner won’t disclose exactly what his annual EAP
budget was before using RFL or what it is now, but says his 2004 costs will run
$300,000 to $700,000, or somewhere between $13.63 and $31.82 per employee. "For
every $1 we put into RFL, we probably save $2 by avoiding more costly
face-to-face intervention," he says.
"There's a great deal of
controversy around online counseling, and until some of that gets resolved,
we've made a decision not to do that."
Not everyone is convinced that teletherapy is the
way to go. Wells Fargo is one of the few Fortune 1000 companies still
running its own EAP operation.
The employee assistance consulting department provides
mental-health and work/life services for the San Francisco corporation’s U.S.
workforce of 145,000. The division employs 35 counselors trained in clinical
mental health or behavioral health, plus a 10-person support staff to run a
24-hour call center in Minneapolis and offices in Phoenix, San Francisco and Los
Angeles. Counselors field incoming calls to a toll-free Wells Fargo EAP hotline.
Though the counselors do some short-term problem-solving over the phone, most
employees are referred to two company Web sites for educational materials on
mental-health topics, or to in-person therapy with health-care or mental-health
providers covered under Wells Fargo’s benefits package.
Counselors also consult with Wells Fargo managers who call
in to discuss everything from problem employees to helping workers cope with
bank robberies. In September, they provided moral support to bank managers and
employees dealing with distraught customers in the aftermath of the hurricanes
in Florida.
The company’s employee-assistance managers made a
conscious decision not to provide teletherapy, based on concerns about employee
confidentiality and lingering questions about licensing requirements for
call-center counselors. In fact, when counselors discuss cases through e-mail,
they encrypt messages. "We’re hypervigilant," says David Cambronne, employee
assistance consulting manager. "There’s a great deal of controversy around
online counseling, and until some of that gets resolved, we’ve made a decision
not to do that."
Wells Fargo employee-assistance managers declined to
discuss how many employees use EAP programs annually or how much the banking
company spends on the service.
Recent developments in the field could help stem some of
the criticisms. In August, the Journal of the American Medical Association
published one of the first scientific studies of phone-based therapy.
Researchers in Seattle conducted an 18-month study of 600 patients receiving
antidepression treatment; a third of the group received eight sessions of
teletherapy in addition to medication. According to the study, by the end of
treatment, 80 percent said their depression was "much improved," compared with
55 percent of those given usual care.
While the results are promising, it’s not a complete
endorsement, says Dr. Greg Simon, the study’s lead researcher and a senior
investigator at Group Health Cooperative, a nonprofit health-care system in
Seattle. "We studied how telephone treatment helped people who were getting no
treatment at all," prior to the study, Simon says. "The real question is how
does telephone treatment compare with regular treatment." He expects to begin
such a study in the next few months.
Elsewhere, officials at Resources for Living say a study
of two years’ worth of data on the effectiveness of teletherapy collected
through their proprietary software was published in the September issue of the
Journal of Brief Therapy, a peer-reviewed psychology research journal.
At least one industry group is working to expand existing
EAP standards to include teletherapy. The Employee Assistance Professionals
Association, an industry trade group in Arlington, Virginia, with 5,000 members,
is revising practice standards to include teletherapy. The issue is sure to be a
topic of conversation at the group’s annual conference in November, says Katie
Borkowski, EAPA professional services manager. "I can’t imagine it not coming up
anymore," she says.
Though questions remain, progress continues. Outsourcers
such as RFL and the Center for Health Promotion, a publicly traded spin-off of
the Group Health Cooperative, are beginning to market e-mail and Web-only health
and wellness programs for weight control, smoking cessation and diabetes
management to EAP managers. In some programs, employees get counseling through
live chat sessions or e-mail, and receive additional help at secure Web sites
customized to their needs.
Workforce Management, November 2004, p. 75-77
-- Subscribe Now!
Michelle V. Rafter is a Workforce Management contributing editor based in Portland, Oregon. E-mail editors@workforce.com to comment.
Reproductions and distribution of the above article are strictly prohibited. To order reprints and/or request permission to use the article in full or partial format, please contact our Reprint Sales Manager at (732) 723-0569.
Comments
Guidelines: Comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed
from the site. We will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies
or any other policies governing this site. You are fully responsible for the content you post.