Compensation, Benefits & Rewards
Home
Complete archive of features and news articles, sample policies and procedures, assessments, and surveys.
Network and exchange ideas with other members in the forums or ask an expert in one of the hosted forums.
Access vendor directories, product case studies and showcases.
Read Best in Shows, view our conference calendar, read commentaries and take our news poll.
The Hot List
Blogs
Topic Channels
Comp, Benefits, Rewards
HR Management
Legal Insight
Recruiting and Staffing
Software and Technology
Training and Development
= Member Only
Workforce HR Jobs
Post Your Job
Post Your Resume



Subscribe Now
Workforce Magazine
Subscriber Help
























= Member Only


Feature:

Twists in the Road to True Consumer-Driven Health Care

  

Feature Contents
Top of Feature

1. Melding Managed Care and Health Care Consumerism
New York Life Insurance Co. is a good example of an employer that responded to the limitations of conventional high-deductible plans by tailoring a more customized health benefit that combines elements of managed care and consumer-driven plans.

2. Novel Plans Are Aimed at Reducing Costs, Paying for Health Care in Retirement



Similar Documents

Related Topics



Sponsored Tools

Discover PCRecruiter HR Solutions
Versatile web-based HR solutions used by nearly 3000 organizations worldwide. Schedule a demo now!


Effectively Manage Your Employee Time
Software & hardware allow you to integrate time tracking & payroll. View a 5-min demonstration here.


Compensation Management Software - eCompensation
Establish pay-for-performance and allocate pay increases with ease. Get your Free Trial today!


Online PHR Certificate Program
SHRM Approved HR Certificate Program from Villanova University. 100% Online - Find Out More Now!


Email Marketing Made Easy
Grow your Business with Easy & Affordable Email Marketing. Start your FREE Trial Today!


Get Listed >>>

 



Novel Plans Are Aimed at Reducing Costs, Paying for Health Care in Retirement


CNH Case New Holland is calling its tailored consumer-oriented plans a success, with projected cost increase for 2007 at just 3 percent. Critics have said the plans are overly complicated, but the company says constant communication with employees made the transition easy.
By Jeremy Smerd

NH Case New Holland, an agricultural machine manufacturer, announced in 2000 that it would discontinue retiree health benefits for new employees, and those employees who were eligible for retiree health benefits would have to pay for 60 percent of cost increases beginning in 2006.

    Double-digit health increases and wasted money—more than 70 percent of employees were paying family premiums of more than $2,000 a year but spending $1,000 on actual health care—were the culprits.

    "We had to draw the line," says Amy Kesler, a company spokeswoman. In fact the Racine, Wisconsin-based company had to overhaul its benefits not just to reduce costs but to prepare employees for the future.

    "The change was needed to help employees save for retirement," Kesler says.

    The first thing CNH decided was that no matter what new plan it created, the company would pay the same amount for each of the four plans it offered, keeping its costs fixed among plan designs. It would be up to employees to decide what kind of coverage they wanted.

    Of the four plan designs CNH introduced in 2006, two would look familiar to any benefits-plan designer. A preferred provider organization network appeals to people who know they will use a lot of health care—those with chronic illnesses or planning an elective surgery. The PPO plan has the highest monthly premiums but the lowest deductible: a $92-a-month premium for salaried employees, a $300 deductible, and a 15 percent co-insurance up to an $1,800 out-of-pocket maximum for employees who earn less than $50,000 or a $2,300 out-of-pocket maximum for employees earning more than $50,000. Forty-three percent of participants enrolled in the PPO plan.

    The drawback is that in a world without retiree health benefits, the plan offers no option to save for retirement health care expenses.

    A second option is a high-deductible plan: $2,200 for single coverage, with a health savings account. The company did not fund the savings account, but with premiums of just $5 a month for salaried workers, 13 percent of them signed up. Whether individuals will take their savings and invest it in their accounts for future use remains to be seen. Experts say employees at companies that do not fund accounts generally don’t fund it themselves, either.

    "I’m not convinced that people are taking savings and putting it into health savings accounts," says Chris Calvert, vice president and senior health consultant at Sibson Consulting. "Most are taking the extra $100 a month and at the end of the year buying a plasma TV."

    CNH also created its Consumer Choice Plan and Consumer Choice Savings Plan, both of which are intended to take a portion of a person’s savings and siphon it into a health retirement account. The account is owned by the employee after five years of employment.

    The Consumer Choice Plan features two deductibles separated by a health reimbursement account, which is funded and owned by the company to pay for individual employee health expenses.

    For individuals, the first deductible is just $250. After that deductible is met, employees will use the $1,000 from the company-funded health reimbursement arrangement to pay for care. After that $1,000 is spent, employees must pay a second deductible of $750. Meanwhile, preventive care is covered 100 percent and prescriptions are covered at 70 percent of cost after a $50 deductible.

    Though the secondary deductible is itself a new way of looking at these plans, things get really interesting if money remains in the account at the end of the year. This is when the company automatically siphons a portion of the health reimbursement account into a company-owned retiree health account and then applies the rest to next year’s deductible. With a twist, of course.

    For individual plans, only $500 of the money left over at the end of each year can be used to pay for next year’s deductible. The rest goes into a health retirement account.
"If you don’t spend it you don’t lose it," Coogan says. But, he adds, "Some of it has to go to pay for retiree medical."

    For example, if none of the $1,000 CNH originally contributed is used, that rolls over to next year’s accounts. Of the $1,000, $500 is put toward next year’s $1,000 deductible and the rest is put into a health retirement account that earns interest and can be owned by the employee after five years.

    The reasons for designing the plan in this way are manifold. One is to counter an argument that is being heard with increasing frequency: Consumers are no longer price conscious once they build up an HSA that is larger than the deductible. Many say this is nonsense, since an HSA is real money owned by individuals. But at CNH, no matter what the savings habits of employees, each year they will have to pay out of pocket for a portion of their health care.

    "It keeps employees aware of the cost," Coogan says. "Otherwise you are almost back to providing first-dollar coverage."

    By tailoring the Consumer Choice Plan this way, the plan does not meet the federal guidelines for an HSA.

    The Consumer Choice Savings Plan, on the other hand, has a $2,200 deductible for single coverage, making it eligible by law for an HSA. The idea behind this plan is that employees who are near retirement can fund the HSA themselves and combine those savings with the leftover money in the company-funded HRA. This plan attracted 4 percent of participants. Forty percent of participants enrolled in the Consumer Choice Plan.

    The company is calling the changes a success. Its projected cost increase for 2007 is 3 percent. Critics have said these plans are overly complicated, but Kesler says constant communication with employees made the transition easy.

    "Communication is key in rolling this out," she says. "And it will continue to be important."

Workforce Management, April 9, 2007, p. 29 -- Subscribe Now!


Jeremy Smerd is a Workforce Management staff writer based in New York. E-mail editors@workforce.com to comment.



Top of Feature | Features Archive

           
E-mail this document Printer-friendly version Write to the Editor Reprint Information

Reproductions and distribution of the above article are strictly prohibited. To order reprints and/or request permission to use the article in full or partial format, please contact our Reprint Sales Manager at (732) 723-0569.







Copyright © 1995-2008 Crain Communications Inc.
All Rights Reserved. Terms of Use Privacy Statement