wo major players in health care have joined forces to create new, practical
approaches employers could use to improve the quality of health care for minority
employees.
Earlier this year, the National Business Group on Health formed
a partnership with the federal Department of Health and Human Services’ Office of
Minority Health to develop strategies aimed at addressing racial and ethnic health
disparities.
The Racial/Ethnic Health Disparities Board and its five subcommittees,
comprising employers, scholars, consultants, providers and other health care experts,
are spending the next two years and $300,000 building the case that improving the
quality of health care for minority employees will have positive results for everyone.
"I hope we begin to have thousands of people’s lives improved
through this," says National Business Group on Health president Helen Darling, adding
that the board is trying to show that narrowing or eliminating gaps in care for
minority groups will end up saving lives and money in the long run.
The subcommittees are examining how to effectively collect
data, refine communication, upgrade the National Business Group on Health’s current
business case in addressing disparities in health care, and encourage employers
to be more specific in what they require from health providers.
The board will also try to answer medical privacy questions
and other complications companies may face in addressing minority health care gaps.
The subcommittees’ recommendations will help develop a more sophisticated tool kit
than the National Business Group on Health currently has, so more employers can
start addressing the issue.
"We need to show what success will look like," Darling says.
The premise for the board’s work has already been established
through a number a studies over the last few years. The studies show that minority
groups—regardless of income, insurance status or community of residence—aren’t as
healthy as their white counterparts, and have higher sickness and death rates. Studies
also have shown that certain minority groups, including African Americans and American
Indians, have higher risks for certain illnesses, including diabetes and high blood
pressure.
Meanwhile, every employer knows health care is expensive,
and costs are only rising. Last year, premiums for employer-sponsored health insurance
rose 6.1 percent, faster than workers’ wages or the overall inflation rate, a Kaiser
Family Foundation report showed.
And while it’s also well known that preventive care and wellness
programs are smart ways to manage health care costs, several studies have shown
low participation rates among minority and ethnic groups. According to a March report
on racial and ethnic health disparities by the Commonwealth Fund, a third of Hispanic
families with incomes of $37,700 or more are uninsured—twice the rate of white families.
According to the report, the disparity in coverage for Hispanics can be attributed
to several factors, including that they are much more likely to be employed at low-wage
jobs and at small firms that are the least likely to offer benefits.
The problems are well documented, but solutions are mostly
anecdotal. For the last two years, the National Committee for Quality Assurance,
which also is part of the Racial/Ethnic Health Disparities Board, has publicly recognized
companies that have created inventive strategies, including reducing or eliminating
language, cultural and other barriers that can block the delivery of quality care
to minority and ethnic groups.
"Part of our goal here is to build the evidence base of what
works" and to develop standards, says Jessica Briefer French, project director for
the National Committee for Quality Assurance’s Multicultural Health Care Awards.
It is difficult to establish ways to improve participation
levels and, in turn, the level of health care for these employees, experts say.
Employers and providers want to do the right thing for everyone, and legally can’t
target one group, or give a specific group a benefit that isn’t available to everyone.
"You can’t target one group at the exclusion of another,"
says Greg Keating, an attorney with firm Littler Mendelson and co-chairman of its
health care practice group in Boston. "Companies need to be careful in how they
respond."
Darling and others agree. The first obstacle to increasing
minority participation in health plans is gathering demographic data. Federal law—and
laws in most states—allows health care providers to collect information on patients’
race and ethnicity. Getting employees to volunteer the information through enrollment
forms, health risk assessments and other Web-based systems is one way to get it.
Last year, Verizon Communications Inc. created an electronic
personal health records tool, where employees enter and access their personal health
information. Verizon combines this data with other resources to give employees information
on when their care may be less than what is considered the medical standard. For
example, employees over the age of 50 whose medical histories show no record of
colorectal screenings will automatically receive preventive care alerts recommending
that they schedule one.
"We just want [employees] to know what tools and programs
are available," says Audrietta Izlar, Verizon’s manager of corporate human resources
and chairwoman of the disparities study board. "We are trying to move people to
a call to action."
Benefit management companies also are developing sophisticated
technology to cull useful data. HighRoads Inc., based in Woburn, Massachusetts,
recently unveiled a new benchmarking tool that allows employers to compare and create
competitive benefits strategies. This program, called the Lab, can adapt to ever-shifting
needs and trends, says Lori Dustin, HighRoads’ chief marketing officer. While it
doesn’t currently assess demographic data, Dustin said the Lab could be adjusted
to suit clients’ requirements.
"We can capture anything we want going forward," Dustin says,
adding that clients have already asked to assess demographic data. "I definitely
see this as a trend."
Employers can also use existing affinity or employee resource
groups to gather data and deliver information, says Andrés Tapia, chief diversity
officer for Hewitt Associates in Lincolnshire, Illinois. Many companies that make
a commitment to diversity give support to these employee-run groups for many minorities,
including Hispanic, Native American and Asian Pacific groups.
At Verizon, some of these groups have existed for more than
20 years, and were a natural way for the company to distribute health education
material and to highlight certain established risks for various groups, Izlar says.
"The people on the distribution list for these groups have
chosen to be on it," Tapia says. "Employers can work with those leaders to increase
participation."
Even with accurate data on demographics, employers need to
be careful in crafting the same message differently for specific groups. Often,
the message needs to be rooted in cultural beliefs and motivators. Tapia says that
some cultures have a fatalistic view of health care and won’t be moved to act simply
by seeing a face resembling theirs on a flier. But appealing to their sense of family
or other cultural stimuli may motivate people to get that checkup or take action
on another health-care need.
Having health professionals speak specific languages is also
a major motivator for some groups, experts agreed. Chinese Community Health Plan
won the National Committee for Quality Assurance’s award for culturally centered
case management by using bilingual registered dieticians, nurses, educators, administrative
assistants and others as part of its effort to educate members about the growing
incidence of diabetes within the Chinese community.
It’s important to have these kinds of multilingual and culturally
sensitive health care and administrative professionals in networks if employees
require them, Darling says. Today, employers need to tell providers that not meeting
these requirements is unacceptable.
Employers "need to make sure these systems are in place,"
Darling says.
Another way to motivate behavior is to create partnerships
with other stakeholders. The National Committee for Quality Assurance recognized
Detroit-based Health Alliance Plan for its work in increasing the number of breast
cancer screenings for its African-American female members working at Ford Motor
Co., Daimler-Chrysler and General Motors.
In 2004, Health Alliance Plan looked at breast cancer screening
rates for these members, ages 50 to 69, and found that 81 percent of white women
received screenings, versus 76 percent of African-American women. To increase participation,
the plan worked on several levels: It created brochures with culturally tailored
information, gave out $20 Target gift cards to women who were screened, and created
a weekend walk-in event where women who received mammograms got other perks including,
massages and refreshments.
Within two years, screening rates for African-American women
rose to 82 percent. One woman who hadn’t received a mammogram in 10 years said the
outreach motivated her to get screened again. "This is a plan that demonstrated
success," Briefer French says.
For this effort to be truly successful, employers need to
link their commitment to diversity with their commitment to ending disparities in
health care, Tapia says. In time, this will happen, but currently, very few companies
see these two areas as being interconnected, he says.
Employers are well schooled in the need for tolerance and
sensitivity when it comes to race and ethnicity in the workplace. But when it comes
to health care, it’s time to address the very real differences that exist among
minority and ethnic groups.
"This is new territory, and employers are starting to experiment
and see how it feels for them," Tapia says. "It’s not a one-size-fits-all solution.
These cross conversations need to happen. All kinds of synergies can develop."
Workforce Management Online, May 2008 -- Register Now!