n February 2004, Janet Lanier applied for a library "page" position with Woodburn
Library in Oregon. It was a position that required her to retrieve and re-shelve
books, and occasionally work a youth service desk. Woodburn made Lanier a conditional
offer of employment, subject to a background check and pre-employment drug and alcohol
screening. The city had adopted a drug and alcohol policy in 2002 that required
that all job candidates pass a drug and alcohol test, and that individuals working
with children undergo an employment history and criminal record review.
Woodburn withdrew its job offer after Lanier refused to agree
to the tests.
Lanier filed a lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the
District of Oregon alleging that Woodburn violated the Fourth Amendment of the U.S.
Constitution and the Oregon state constitution, both of which preclude unreasonable
searches and seizures. The district court held that Woodburn’s policy was unconstitutional.
On appeal to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit,
the court reversed, and held that while Woodburn’s policy was unconstitutionally
applied, it was not facially invalid. Given that certain city jobs directly affect
public safety, suspicionless drug and alcohol screening is reasonable with regard
to those employees. However, concerns regarding Lanier’s contact with children were
not sufficiently substantial or particularized to justify testing, and library employees
are not in a position to influence children. Lanier v. Woodburn, 9th Cir., No. 06-35262
(3/13/08).
Impact: Employers are advised that state and federal law should
always be considered before adopting mandatory pre-employment drug testing policies.
Workforce Management Online, May 2008 -- Register Now!