ecruiters
looking for IT talent are hitting the wall in Detroit, Philadelphia, Phoenix, St.
Louis, San Diego, Washington and other labor markets where more than 20 percent
of the companies plan to boost their IT staffing in the second quarter of 2007.
"Near term, we don’t see any change in the IT labor market,"
says Mike Valek, vice president of Hudson’s IT practice. "Longer term, technology
has become so prevalent in every business that we don’t see any major pulling back
in IT hiring."
In a recent survey of 1,400 chief information officers by
Robert Half Technology, CIOs reported that it now takes an average of 56 days to
hire a staff-level IT employee and 87 days to land a new IT manager, well beyond
acceptable time-to-fill rates for companies where IT talent is already stretched
too thin. Recruiters are spending more time sourcing but reaping fewer results;
time-strapped hiring managers are unable to devote additional effort to recruiting
and evaluating candidates.
Nationwide, 14 percent of companies plan to increase IT hiring
in the second quarter of 2007 and 2 percent plan to decrease hiring, according to
the Robert Half survey. In the second quarter of 2006, 12 percent of companies planned
to increase hiring and 4 percent planned a decrease.
For the past eight quarters, the proportion of companies projecting
increased IT hiring has remained in the 12 percent to 16 percent range, with projected
decreases running between 1 percent and 4 percent.
The most active hiring is at companies with more than 1,000
employees, where one-fifth are planning to expand IT staffing in the second quarter
of 2007. The finance, insurance and real estate industry leads all sectors in hiring
projections, with 38 percent of the CIOs planning to hire on additional IT staff
in the second quarter and only 1 percent projecting a decrease, according to the
Robert Half survey.
With supply already tight and high levels of hiring projected
for the year, recruiters will face extraordinarily tough competition for IT candidates.
Company recruiters working to meet the need for higher internal IT headcounts are
competing against outsourcing and technology vendors, consulting firms and staffing
agencies for the same talent.
Heavy hiring at the technology companies will wipe out a large
part of the available pool. Culpepper’s survey on hiring plans for 2007 reports
that 53 percent of technology companies with more than 1,000 employees plan to increase
staffing this year, with 27 percent reporting that they plan to increase headcount
by 20 percent or more.
Smaller technology companies are recruiting at an even faster
pace, with 90 percent planning to increase staffing in 2007 and almost one-third
reporting that they will expand headcount by 20 percent or more. With the supply
of H-1B visas already exhausted for the year beginning in October, recruiters will
not be able to source abroad for IT talent.
Converting contractors
Employers are increasingly anxious to convert IT contract
workers into permanent hires, but the supply is limited, especially for the advanced
work that is most in demand. In Hudson’s IT practice, one out of every three of
contract employees converts to a permanent hire.
Among those with highly specialized skills, however, the conversion
rate is only 10 percent to 20 percent. "Some senior-level subject-matter experts
are contract mercenaries," Valek says. "They enjoy the financial benefits, and they
are difficult to bring into permanent positions. We see more conversions among junior
and midlevel employees."
For high-level free agents, temp-to-perm is always a possibility,
Snelling COO Dan Glazier notes. "But this is a candidate-driven market," he says.
"If a worker has been on contract for many years and is older, his or her perspective
on benefits may have changed and the temp-to-perm offer may be more attractive."
With other contract employees, however, employers may have to work hard to make
the conversion attractive.
At the higher skill levels, workers earn 15 percent to 30
percent more as contract employees. "The benefits for permanent positions tend to
be slightly better, especially if it's a Fortune 500 company, so contract workers
will weigh this tradeoff," Glazier notes. Snelling’s studies show that benefits
are important to temp workers, but not as important as wages.
"With contract rates 15 percent to 30 percent higher for technology
jobs, there’s not much an employer can do to convert a candidate," says Scott Ragusa,
president of Winter, Wyman. "Another 5 percent to 10 percent in salary is not going
to do it. Also, the client company should be aware that it is selling the firm to
the candidate and should be sure to offer the candidate challenging work."
Valek reports that Hudson has seen some upward momentum in
salaries for permanent positions. "With the tight labor markets, more employers
are going straight to permanent positions instead of looking at contract employees,"
he says.
Don Weis, vice president of national recruiting for Spherion,
advises HR executives to exercise caution in trying to convert contract employees.
"It can be a great opportunity, but there may be difficult issues involved in trying
to convince a passive candidate to accept a permanent position."
The salary difference between contract and permanent employees
is an integral part of the negotiation process. "Companies that do it right have
it all worked out in advance, with details on the benefits and bonuses offered,
so they can sell the offer to the candidate and get the employee on board," Weis
says.
The key is to determine what is important to the candidate
at that particular time. Benefits may not be appealing, particularly if the candidate
has coverage through a spouse. "You must find what appeals to that individual,"
Weis notes.
In response to tighter labor markets and the need to convert
contractors, employers began raising wages for permanent positions in the last half
of 2006, reports Eric Buntin, managing director of Randstad USA. "The 15 percent
to 30 percent wage differential for contract workers is shrinking to 10 percent
to 25 percent, and some temps are beginning to respond to this by becoming more
willing to look at permanent positions," he notes.
Raising wages to turn temps into permanent hires or to bring
in new hires often creates problems down the road when internal pay equity falls
apart. Hourly wages for technology workers rose 3.1 percent in 2006, according to
Yoh. Overall technology wages are up 15 percent from 2002, restoring most of what
was lost when wages crashed during the 2001 recession.
Starting salaries for IT project managers will rise 4.1 percent
in 2007, with the range running from $72,750 to $106,250, according to Robert Half
Technology. But high-demand skills such as service-oriented architecture and business
process re-engineering could see starting salary increases of 10 percent or more.
Culpepper reports that half of all technology and life sciences
companies are using signing bonuses to bring on talent. Among firms with more than
5,000 employees, three-quarters are offering signing bonuses. The vast majority
pay a flat dollar amount.
For technical managers and professionals, a slim majority
of companies pay signing bonuses of $1,000 to $4,999, but one-third pay $5,000 to
$10,000. For executive positions, signing bonuses may exceed $50,000.
At 54 percent of the technology and life sciences covered
in the Culpepper report, signing bonuses are paid in one lump in the first paycheck.
Among companies that split the payout, most provide full payment after three months.
Data from the first quarter of 2007 indicate that labor markets
for technology employees will continue to tighten. From February to March 2007,
employment in computer systems design jumped 7.1 percent, according to the U.S .Bureau
of Labor Statistics.
Unemployment for workers with a bachelor’s degree or higher
dropped from 1.9 percent in February to an even lower 1.8 percent in March. For
the information industry as a whole, unemployment is a low 3.2 percent.
The IT skill sets most in demand— Microsoft Windows administration,
network administration, database management and other specialized fields— exist
in relatively fixed quantities that are quickly depleted during an expansion.
"Employers are quickly coming to the realization that the
market is tight and they are reviewing the skill sets they require," Valek notes.
In Hudson’s IT practice, contract work represents 80 percent of the business, and
its recruiters must constantly pull in new employees to replace the contractors
lost to permanent positions. "The supply problem is in the senior positions," Valek
says.
"We use all available techniques for sourcing. When I walk
past our recruiting bullpen, it’s not uncommon for me to see people using LinkedIn
or other networks. IT professionals are the first adopters of any technology developments,
so we have to stay ahead of them."
Hudson’s recruiters are having a particularly difficult time
filling positions for project managers and subject-matter experts. "We have to be
more proactive and invest more in the recruiting base," Valek says. "We are becoming
more specialized so that we know the right person to call from the beginning."
For internal recruiters, short-term solutions to the IT labor
market squeeze include rotating in employees from other parts of the business and
training them into IT positions, pulling in third-party recruiters or dedicating
internal recruiting staff to IT hiring. In the long term, careful staff development,
succession planning and building internal recruiting resources with a deep knowledge
of the company’s IT needs will be necessary.
Experts agree that CIO involvement is essential. Recruiters
are only fully effective when they can evaluate all the alternative methods for
meeting staffing needs—permanent hire, contractor, outsourcing—and the CIO must
set the guidelines for this process.
Workforce Management Online, April 2007 -- Register Now!