ohn Maynard’s commute isn’t much different from those of most executives, in
that he shuttles from one town to another to get from home to work.
Except Maynard, CEO of the Employee Assistance Program Association,
has spent the past four years shuttling the roughly 1,700 miles between his hometown
of Boulder, Colorado, and the 5,000-member association’s headquarters in Arlington,
Virginia.
Maynard is among a new breed of executives who refuse to relocate
for their job and instead opt for an alternate arrangement known as extreme commuting,
which involves either making a weekly trek by plane or traveling daily by car for
more than 90 minutes each way to and from work.
"When they offered me the job, I said I was interested but
that I would not want to relocate," Maynard recalls. He didn’t want to leave Colorado
primarily because of friends and family, but he also likes the lifestyle the Rocky
Mountain state has to offer.
"Many job candidates view relocation as a deal-breaker," says
Jeff Hocking, managing director of Korn/Ferry International’s San Francisco office.
Fifty-five percent of the 198 international consultants who participated in the
12th edition of Korn/Ferry’s Executive Recruiter Index say it is more difficult
today than it was in the past to persuade candidates to relocate for new job opportunities.
Released November 12, the quarterly survey was administered to recruiters within
the Americas, the Asia Pacific region, Europe, the Middle East and Africa.
Hocking says the reluctance among candidates to relocate poses
a competitive drawback for employers, many of whom are coming up empty searching
for qualified talent.
"There are many hurdles that employers must contend with to
get good people in their doors," he notes. "Unwillingness to relocate makes recruiting
trickier."
High-profile companies including Hewlett-Packard and Sun Microsystems
are adopting measures to facilitate extreme commuting, which often entails four-day
workweeks, telecommuting and flexible hours.
Almost 85 percent of the Korn/Ferry survey respondents say
companies are at least somewhat open to having executives engaged in frequent traveling
instead of relocating—a trend that is strongest among technology companies.
Extreme commuting not for everyone
The hourlong Monday morning flights from San Diego to the Bay Area are filled with
extreme commuters who don’t want to leave their little corner of paradise but still
want to work for a prestigious Silicon Valley employer. Many commuters are high-powered
sales executives, Hocking notes.
This does not come as a surprise, as certain positions lend
themselves to extreme commuting more than others—a factor companies should consider
when recruiting and hiring, Hocking adds.
"Employees who already do extensive traveling, such as sales
executives, don’t need to be anchored in a particular city. For them, the face time
that counts is the kind that’s spent in front of clients," he explains.
Other positions require deeper interaction with colleagues,
which could mean the flexibilities that are often intertwined with extreme commuting—such
as working from home or condensing the workweek—could hamper their activities.
Whether an employer allows extreme commuting could depend
on the type of corporate culture a company wants to foster, says Mark Stiffler,
CEO of Chester, Pennsylvania-based Synygy, which specializes in compensation-related
performance management.
Synygy recently ended a company policy that facilitated extreme
commuting. Some 25 of its 450 employees had been allowed to work from home up to
two days per week, depending on the length of their commute.
"It became evident that the initiative was not in sync with
our core value of harnessing a strong team dynamic," Stiffler says. "It’s disruptive
to have people out of the office."
Stiffler, however, isn’t writing off extreme commuting altogether.
"There are some instances that don’t require a daily presence,"
he says.
Regardless of whether extreme commuters are working from the
office or utilizing a flexible schedule, Stiffler says ground rules need to be established.
For one, there should always be transparency about where the
extreme commuter will be on a given day.
"This way, even when they’re not in the office, everyone knows
how to get in touch with them," Stiffler explains. In addition, he says it is important
for employees who are often on the road to be consistent about their phone manner.
"They should always answer the phone with a professional greeting and be ready to
reply swiftly to clients."
Keeping track of extreme commuters
Since extreme commuters are often out of the direct eye of supervisors, it behooves
employers to develop guidelines that ensure they are complying with their jobs properly,
experts say.
One good habit—useful not just for extreme commuters but for
managing talent across the board—is for employers to determine how a specific position
contributes to the overall success of a company.
"Everyone plays a part in helping companies reach their objectives,
from the receptionist to the CEO," Stiffler says.
It’s important for companies to have a clear picture of what
an individual’s direct contribution will be, because only then will they be able
to accurately assess how an employee is performing.
In some cases this undertaking is fairly straightforward.
The performance of a sales executive is closely tied to the dollar amount brought
in during a given period of time, Stiffler explains. Other situations, however,
are trickier because they may not be aligned with an identifiable metric.
Regardless of how an employer chooses to evaluate performance,
it needs to be conveyed clearly, Hocking says.
"Extreme commuters are like every other employee," he says.
"They should be measured on their individual contributions to the company."
The burnout factor
"Extreme commuting is not for the faint of heart," Hocking says. Yet, some 70 percent
of participants in the Korn/Ferry survey say executives are increasingly open to
extreme commuting.
They choose a transient lifestyle for particular reasons.
Family ties were cited as the primary factor, according to the study. Hocking says
this is not surprising, considering that many executives happen to be at an age
range—40 to 55—where they are married and have children.
"It is a function of the demographic that’s in question."
he notes. "Rather than to uproot a working spouse from professional commitments
or to go through the tricky process of transferring a child from school, extreme
commuting is winning out."
Other factors besides family come into play. Lifestyle and
housing market costs also influence extreme commuting, the Korn/Ferry report indicates.
Whatever the reason for choosing extreme commuting instead
of relocation, being on the road often takes a toll on workers, ultimately threatening
productivity and adversely affecting retention.
Jen Cassidy, a sales analyst for Universal Music, spent almost
a year commuting 50 miles from Costa Mesa to Burbank, California. The trek took
anywhere from 90 minutes to 2½ hours each way. She logged some 28,000 miles in her
Honda Civic and spent about $4,200 on gas during that time.
"You get to a point where you wonder; is this job even worth
all the hassle?" Cassidy says.
Despite rising by 5:45 every morning, she was almost always
late because of traffic.
"I would show up to morning meetings all flustered," she says.
"It was so frustrating because I had done the responsible thing by waking up early,
but the road was always a nightmare."
The commute drained her energy and affected her attitude.
But that changed November 1, when she relocated three miles
away from work and reduced her commute time to nine minutes. Cassidy says her productivity
has surged and that she is more engaged in her work.
"I come in on time every morning," she notes. "I’m much more
willing to stay overtime if I need to."
Not all tales of extreme commuting conclude like Cassidy’s.
The burnout sometimes leads directly to turnover, says Maynard, who makes at least
one trip a month to the Employee Assistance Program Association’s Arlington headquarters
and spends about 10 days at the office. The rest of the time he is either on business
trips or working from home in Colorado.
In the instances where an extreme commuter remains with a
company, the physical fatigue often affects productivity. Consequently it behooves
companies to make special considerations for extreme commuters, Maynard explains.
He suggests that employers adopt an aggressive flextime policy.
Depending on the position, an employee doesn’t have to work during the traditional
9-to-5 schedule. Allowing extreme commuters to come as early as 6 a.m. or as late
as 10 a.m. significantly helps cut the amount of time they spend in rush hour traffic.
Maynard urges employers to be creative and open-minded when
it comes to extreme commuters.
"You’ll be surprised at what you can achieve," he says.
Workforce Management Online, December 2007 -- Register Now!