|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
Feature Contents
1. How to Choose a Temporary Help Agency
How many companies should you choose? Which ones? Here's a checklist of guidelines for you to think about.
2. When Temp Jobs Tumble, the Economy Stumbles?
The number of temporary jobs in the U.S. declined during the first four months of 2007, the first sign of a possible slowdown in a sector that often serves as an early predictor of the overall health of domestic employment.
Similar Documents
Related Topics
Tips on Reducing Co-Employment Problems When Utilizing a Staffing Service
Many of the problems come from situations in which the customer unnecessarily assumes employment responsibilities over the temporary workforce.
By James Kingma
aving practiced in the staffing industry for a number of years, I was surprised
that many customers, including large companies utilizing a big temporary workforce,
hadn’t developed any policy to protect against co-employment problems arising from
their interaction with staffing services and their temporary employees.
Unfortunately, many of the problems come from situations in
which the customer unnecessarily assumes employment responsibilities over the temporary
workforce. By following some simple guidelines, the customer should be able to limit
the possibility of co-employment problems and associated liability.
Here are some practical tips:
-
Let the staffing service do its job. When you pay the staffing
service an hourly rate for the services of a temporary employee, you are paying
not only for the services of that employee, but also for the services of the staffing
service in recruiting and selecting those employees. You should allow the staffing
service to perform that function by interviewing, testing and selecting those individuals.
If you perform any of those functions, you are telling the temporary employee that
you are the hiring employer, rather than the staffing service. Although you may
have reservations about delegating those duties to a staffing service, you may find
that the testing and selection procedures of the staffing service are effective.
Ask the staffing service for a demonstration of their selection and testing functions.
-
If there is a large temporary workforce, ask that the staffing
service provide on-site representation. If you have a large temporary workforce,
the staffing service may be willing to provide on-site representatives to perform
the administrative functions and handle all performance counseling and disciplinary
action. In addition to being more effective than communicating with the local staffing
office, the presence and involvement of a staffing service representative will also
have the effect of emphasizing the staffing service’s role as the employer. Ideally,
these representatives should have their own separate office. These benefits usually
far outweigh the costs charged by the staffing service.
-
Avoid taking unilateral disciplinary action. One of the biggest
mistakes a customer can make is to "fire" a temporary employee. The words "fire,"
"termination" or "discharge" should not be part of your vocabulary in dealing with
temporary employees. Although you should be willing to provide information regarding
a temporary employee’s performance to the staffing service, it should be responsible
for performance counseling or other forms of discipline. If the staffing service
does not have an on-site representative, the temporary employee should be required
to report back to the staffing service office to discuss any disciplinary action
with the employee. Although your supervisors may prefer the temporary employee be
removed from the assignment, their reasons and their preference for removal should
be discussed with the staffing service and the decision of what form the discipline
should take should be mutually agreed upon. Even better, if the staffing service
is familiar with your standards of performance, it should be making the decision
on what form of discipline is appropriate.
-
Be willing to provide information on the temporary employee’s
performance problems. Although it is an employer-related function to evaluate performance,
the reality of utilizing a staffing service is that in most cases, supervisors are
in a better position to evaluate performance than staffing service representatives.
Informing the staffing service of the specific performance problems is necessary
and should actually work in your favor. Otherwise, when the temporary employee is
subjected to disciplinary action, such as removal from the assignment, the staffing
service will be unable to provide the employee with the reason for the removal.
In the absence of any explanation, the employee may assume there is something to
hide, such as discrimination. If a discrimination charge is filed, the staffing
service will be forced to report that it has no knowledge of what happened, and
although the staffing service may then be off the hook, it is likely the investigation
will be directed toward the customer. In comparison, an employee who is given the
performance-related reasons for a disciplinary action is far less likely to consider
the action to be discriminatory or to file a charge. It also gives the staffing
service the opportunity to emphasize its role as the employer by counseling the
employee and handing out disciplinary action.
-
Generally, do not include temporary employees in company employee
functions. Obviously, if a temporary employee is included in the customer’s employee
functions, it sends a signal to the employee that the customer is an employer. There
may, however, be situations where the benefit of including the temporary employees
as a morale booster outweighs the potential disadvantages of treating the temporary
employee in the same way as a customer employee. If temporary employees are included,
the staffing service should handle the invitations.
-
If a discrimination charge is filed by a temporary employee
against your company, coordinate your response with the staffing service. If your
company had any involvement in the factual situation that forms the basis for the
discrimination charge, it will not be effective to simply argue your company is
not the employer. In most cases, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission and
state agencies will ignore arguments of that nature and require that you submit
a response telling the agency what you know. If you have followed these guidelines,
you will be able to demonstrate that your company did not make any employment-related
decisions. The worst situation that can develop is when the customer and the staffing
service start pointing fingers at each other. When versions of what occurred as
related by two respondents are contradictory, it’s likely that regardless of what
happened, the investigating agency will find reasonable cause to believe both respondents
discriminated against the complainant. It’s important that the respective responses
to the charge include no inadvertent contradictions, and that can only be accomplished
by coordinating your response with the staffing service.
-
Your experts should review your benefit plan descriptions
to make certain that temporary employees are effectively excluded from participation.
As you may know, lawsuits have been filed by groups of temporary employees claiming
they have a right to participate in customer benefit plans—most notably Vizcaino
v. Microsoft Corp. Several such lawsuits have been decided in favor of the customer
based at least in part on the clear wording in the benefit plan description, which
both defines and specifically excludes temporary employees from participation. However,
even that safeguard can be meaningless if the temporary employees can demonstrate
that they should be legally regarded as customer employees. Although your legal
advisors should be consulted, it is possible to draft exclusionary language that
makes benefit entitlement dependent on your employment classifications regardless
of their actual status under a common law definition. Of course, not treating temporary
employees as your employees is also extremely important.
Ideally, your only connection with the temporary employees
should be supervising their work and by necessity evaluating their performance.
However, during the past few years, a concept known as "managed services" has been
gaining popularity. In a managed services situation, the staffing service would
agree to provide direct supervision over the work and take full responsibility for
performing a particular work function on an ongoing basis. While the customer may
continue to assume responsibility for reviewing and approving the final work product,
the customer would have absolutely no contact with the temporary employees and therefore
would not be considered a co-employer. If your company presently has an isolated
function of that nature that’s only peripheral to your core business, you may wish
to consider this approach. To be effective, establishing a managed services project
will take time and require the sophisticated expertise of both the staffing service
and the customer.
Finally, form a partnership with your staffing service to
establish an effective procedure from both a legal and an operational standpoint
in managing the temporary workforce. Some important policies and procedures should
be implemented before the relationship with the staffing service begins and it is
important to consult with your legal advisors during that process. The goal of avoiding
co-employment problems can only be achieved by a concerted and cooperative effort.
Workforce Management Online, May 2008 -- Register Now!
James Kingma is an independent consultant specializing in the employment and
corporate legal areas. He was previously a legal officer with international
staffing company Manpower Inc. E-mail editors@workforce.com to comment.
Features Archive
|
Reproductions and distribution of the above article are strictly prohibited. To order reprints and/or request permission to use the article in full or partial format, please contact our Reprint Sales Manager at (732) 723-0569.
|
|
|