n their book
Leading People Through Disasters: An Action Guide Preparing for and Dealing With
the Human Side of Crises, authors Kathryn D. McKee, SPHR, and Liz Guthridge
lay out a step-by-step blueprint to help HR professionals deal with the effect of
disasters on their workforces.
Workforce Management is pleased to provide you with
four advance excerpts from McKee and Guthridge’s book, which is published by Berrett-Koehler
Publishers and available July 28, 2006
Book Excerpt
Part 3–Leading People Through Disasters
An Action Guide: Preparing for and Dealing With the Human Side of Crises
Balancing the needs of employees with getting back to work
Getting back to work after a disaster
When the rains, winds, fire or floods have ceased, it’s time to pay attention in
equal part to people’s physical and emotional states in anticipation of going back
to work.
You’ve got to consider where your employees will report to work, whether they
have the tools, information and other resources they need to do their job, and what
tasks they need to focus on. As daunting as that may seem considering what has happened,
the challenges of getting employees established into a new work setting may be straightforward
compared with dealing with employees’ emotional states.
As a manager, you may have to deal with employees’ feelings of loss, uncertainty,
confusion, fear, sadness, anxiety and anger. You may need to deal with issues of
safety, health, and job security. When you and your employees have to work under
difficult conditions, everyone’s frustrations can work against the organization’s
goals and objectives.
Getting business systems up and running again
In the hours and days after the disaster first strikes, organization leaders frequently
become consumed with the logistics of the business interruption. In fact, most business
continuity plans concentrate on backup computer systems, backup mechanical systems,
off-site locations for resuming work and perhaps an emergency operations center
large enough for the most critical executives for command-and-control efforts.
Getting people back to productivity
But what about backup human systems? What thought have you given to employees whose
homes have been destroyed? Or, those who can’t get to the work site or, conversely,
can’t get home from work? What about those with missing family members? Those who
are separated from their pets?
These are subjects you need to address as you build your business continuity
plan, including developing contingent human resource policies. As a rule of thumb,
acts of nature that cut a wide or deep swath can have more devastating effects on
more humans for longer times than a company-specific problem, such as a plant explosion
or a building fire. That’s why it’s so important to think broadly when preparing
for disasters. If you’re to resume your business operations, you need employees
back at work.
For example, northeast Ohio is several hundred miles from tornado alley, but
that didn’t stop a twister from bisecting a Delphi plant there one Friday evening
in 1985. Michael Hissam, now regional director of corporate affairs for Delphi Mexico
Operations, worked at the facility as Delphi’s lead media contact. The plant, which
ran multiple shifts, had a disaster preparedness plan that immediately went into
action. Even though it hadn’t taken tornadoes into account, the plan was thorough
enough for the plant to resume operations first thing Monday morning.
Not all employees were back to work. One employee lost her life at the plant,
and more than 200 had been injured either at the plant or in the neighboring area.
Others lost their homes. Hissam remembers that it took months for some people to
recover, not only from their physical injuries but also from their property damage
and the trauma. Other employees pitched in to cover for their co-workers on the
job, and many contributed money to help with the financial strain. Members of the
HR staff spent time helping affected employees and their families.
More recently, 30 inches of rain fell in Santa Barbara, California, over a two-week
period in January 2005. Normal rainfall is less than half that amount. The typically
dry and rocky riverbeds were white-water rushing to the sea and in some cases overflowing
their banks. An area south of Santa Barbara suffered a horrendous landslide, 10
people were killed, and the only north-south highway was closed in both directions
for more than a week. As if that weren’t awful enough, at the north end of the Santa
Barbara coastline, the same highway was closed for a day because of an overturned
truck as well as mudslides and overflowing creeks.
Thus, the area was landlocked, and employers were bewildered about how to keep
their operations going with some employees stuck at work and others stuck at home.
Employers scrambled to find hotel rooms for those at work. Some employees who were
at home could work from their residences. But there were a lot of people who were
not working, or working shortened schedules and having a difficult time concentrating
when they were working. Employees were concerned about adequate food, shelter and
clothing, as well as their paychecks.
Employers were wondering, "Do we pay or not pay?" Some employers could and did
so. Other employers decided they could not afford to pay for time not worked, but
did allow their nonexempt employees to use vacation pay. This underscores the critical
nature of developing contingent pay policies based on what you are financially capable
of providing. Some employers after Hurricane Katrina and other hurricane-related
disasters were able to reassure their employees with full pay for a period of time.
Pay or no pay, some employees may decide to move on, which can really throw a
wrench into a company’s business recovery. "Employees and management are not drinking
the same Kool-Aid," observes Charles Pizzo, crisis communication expert and hurricane
Katrina evacuee. Employees have a lot more on their minds than returning to work.
"Employees’ first responsibility is to themselves and their families. They’re concerned
about their self-preservation; they’re thinking about their safety, not their work,"
especially if they’re in a minimum-wage job.
If employers have failed to create sound plans for dealing with disasters and
getting the business back on track with their employees’ needs in mind, Pizzo says
these employers run a big risk of losing employees. "By not taking actions, either
to plan or to take actions afterward to help, employers (particularly those in the
service industry with lots of low-level customer-facing jobs) are leaving their
businesses totally vulnerable."
Impact of employee trauma on the business
Getting employees back to work after a crisis is just the first step. Trauma experts
and others who are familiar with the human systems side of business continuity planning
know that crises can contribute to tension in the workplace, which manifests itself
in multiple ways. Besides the high attrition, businesses can suffer costly workers’
compensation claims, spiraling medical costs, excessive absenteeism and loss of
productivity. And these issues may continue long after the emergency has passed.
Helping employees through the trauma of disaster
Managers and supervisors who are most familiar with the work habits and personalities
of their employees can play a critical role in preventing problems, detecting difficulties
and motivating people to accept outside help. HR also can help by recommending outside
resources, many of which may be company-paid.
Everyone needs to look out for everyone else. Problems detected and solved early
in the post-catastrophe situation reap benefits for employees and the company alike.
Employees will experience fewer traumas, or at least recover faster and stronger.
Co-workers who aren’t feeling the adverse affects of the disaster won’t feel as
burdened by, or resentful of, the extra work they’ve taken on to help out. As a
result, morale can improve faster, and employee relations will be better.
The employer can minimize its exposure to costly workers’ compensation claims
and medical and disability claims. You also may improve attendance and tardiness
faster than you would otherwise, which will increase your chances for maintaining
satisfactory productivity levels.
Please see: Part 1, Part 2, Part 4
Workforce Management Online, June 2006 -- Register Now!