HR Management

= Member Only

Feature:

SHRM at a Crossroads

Feature Contents
Top of Feature

1. Letters on “SHRM at a Crossroads”
Readers respond to Workforce Management’s feature story on SHRM

2. From the Editor: Why We’re Writing About SHRM
“SHRM at a Crossroads” represents many months of work by the staff of Workforce Management. Most of the reporting, writing and research has been done by Washington-based Mark Schoeff Jr., a reporter who has worked in Washington for a long time, knows SHRM and sees it in action on Capitol Hill. He worked hard to make sure the story told all sides, and when you read the package, I think you’ll see that’s the case.

3. SHRM’s Reserves: Typical or Towering?
Depending on how you look at its financial reserves, the Society for Human Resource Management is either a fortress of fiscal strength or just a typical, well-run nonprofit.

4. SHRM Halts Expansion of E-Verify

5. WorldatWork Invades SHRM’s Space in Washington
With the advent of Democratic majorities in the House and Senate in 2007, more attention is being paid to employment leave policies and to pay—from enormous amounts that company executives make to the seeming stagnation of a typical worker’s check

6. HRPS Publication Takes Strategic Focus
While the society for Human Resource Management’s rebranding efforts highlight that HR is its middle name, the Human Resource Planning Society has decided to remove an HR reference from the title of its flagship publication.

SHRM Halts Expansion of E-Verify

Just as Congress was entering the final stages of wrestling with government funding bills in november, the Society for Human Resource Management was holding its leadership conference in Washington.
By Mark Schoeff Jr.

ust as Congress was entering the final stages of wrestling with government funding bills in November, the Society for Human Resource Management was holding its leadership conference in Washington.

The timing was propitious for SHRM’s lobbying operation, which was in the midst of a battle to remove language from several appropriations measures that would require all federal contractors to use the government’s electronic employment verification system.

The system, formerly known as Basic Pilot but now renamed E-Verify, has drawn strong criticism from the business community. SHRM asserts that it is inefficient, ineffective and prone to error.

About 24,000 employers use it voluntarily. The rider in the appropriations bills would have mandated that 200,000 federal contractors sign up. SHRM says that such an enlargement could severely disrupt the U.S. labor market because so many people would be declared ineligible to work.

For now, SHRM has halted such an expansion. Leading a coalition of HR groups, the organization was able to jettison the E-Verify riders from the appropriations bills.

Members of Congress "realized the shortcomings" of E-Verify, says Mike Aitken, SHRM director of government affairs. "There was a feeling that it wasn’t ready for prime time yet."

The sentiment was fostered in part by SHRM’s lobbying efforts. During its November leadership conference, it took 207 members to Capitol Hill to talk to House members, senators and their staffs.

"We were able to raise awareness about employer verification," says William Maroni, SHRM chief external affairs officer.

The message they got across is that verification policy should be considered more carefully, not tacked onto other bills.

"There was a lot of receptivity to not legislating through appropriations," Aitken said.

The skirmish over E-Verify demonstrates that Congress hasn’t given up on immigration reform even though the failure of a Senate bill last spring likely squelched the possibility of a broad measure that encompasses both sanctions and a path toward citizenship for illegal workers.

But Republicans and conservative Democrats, many of whom were in the vanguard of the Democratic takeover of Congress, are enamored of a crackdown on illegal employment.

A bill that was introduced in November 2007 by Rep. Heath Shuler, D-North Carolina, has attracted more than 100 bipartisan co-sponsors and requires that employers sign up for E-Verify.

SHRM will stay engaged in the debate, urging Congress to develop a better verification system rather than just reauthorize E-Verify when the law establishing it expires in November 2008.

"Our members really are the experts at what works and what doesn’t work," Maroni says.

Workforce Management, February 4, 2008, p. 22 -- Subscribe Now!

Mark Schoeff is a Workforce Management staff writer based in Washington. E-mail editors@workforce.com to comment.
Next Article: 5. WorldatWork Invades SHRM’s Space in Washington
With the advent of Democratic majorities in the House and Senate in 2007, more attention is being paid to employment leave policies and to pay—from enormous amounts that company executives make to the seeming stagnation of a typical worker’s check

Top of Feature | Features Archive


E-mail this document			Printer-friendly version			Write to the Editor			Reprint Information

Reproductions and distribution of the above article are strictly prohibited. To order reprints and/or request permission to use the article in full or partial format, please contact our Reprint Sales Manager at (732) 723-0569.