5. Comparison Shopping
AMR Research evaluated the strengths and weaknesses of PeopleSoft, Oracle and SAP.
6. No One System Does it All
A chart showing the percentages of companies' HR systems that are developed in house, purchased or outsourced.
7. Technology Forum
Discuss how to choose system that will yield the best results, as well as how to maintain it, and how to calculate its return on investment. (Please note that this forum is dedicated to workforce-management professionals only, and not for employees.)
Leading HRMS companies are flexible enough to open their systems for add-ons.
By Douglas P. Shuit Comments 0 | Recommend 0
epsiAmericas
was using a PeopleSoft HRMS system for payroll last year but was still struggling
with cumbersome spreadsheets for other compensation issues. That’s when a salesperson
from Authoria made a cold call, offering the company’s knowledge management tools.
The timing was perfect.
"We were trying to figure out how to get summary plan benefits
out," says Dana Sacks, vice president of compensation and benefits and human
resources information systems for PepsiAmericas, an independently owned Pepsi bottler
with 15,000 employees worldwide.
Putting the benefit plan books out involved wrestling with big
spiral-bound notebooks and the added expense of printing and mailing them.
Authoria’s solution was to do it online, which not only cut
through a lot of time-consuming labor but also offered the possibility of easy
updates that would allow PepsiAmericas to keep up to date with program changes.
PeopleSoft had the ability to mix and match its products and had a working
arrangement with Authoria that allowed a hookup to its HRMS system.
"Our IT department has always wanted us to leverage PeopleSoft
to its full extent. In my mind, that doesn’t always mean using PeopleSoft
applications," Sacks says. "Authoria is a PeopleSoft partner. They have knowledge of
how PeopleSoft works. That was a big advantage to us."
The decision to go with Authoria is part of a trend: Leading
HRMS companies are flexible enough to open their systems for add-ons that workforce
managers are demanding in order to better train, track and reward the talent in their
companies. Enterprise HRMS systems run by Oracle, SAP and Lawson Software collect
vast amounts of data. Talent management software companies like Authoria develop ways
to put that employee information to strategic use.
Todd Chambers, vice president of marketing for Authoria, puts
it this way: "It’s all about how you identify your top performers, how you make sure
you are paying them appropriately, how you retain them, grow them and move them to
midlevel manager, then upper-level management."
"There was a positive return on
our investment in Year One. It was quicker, faster, cheaper." --Dana Sachs, vice president of compensation and benefits and human resources
information systems for PepsiAmericas
Sacks is sold on partnerships like the one between PeopleSoft
and Authoria, particularly the way it came into play in streamlining the disbursement
of bonus checks to PepsiAmericas employees. Under the old system, bonuses were being
figured out on spreadsheets. Mistakes were being made. People weren’t getting their
checks. These days, everyone is happy, Sacks says.
"There was a positive return on our investment in Year One,"
Sacks says. "It was quicker, faster, cheaper."
For Sacks, shopping around for human resources software means
learning a bit more about IT than she might have thought she needed. "I’m doing my
best to learn this IT stuff," she says.
She says PepsiAmericas uses Authoria’s Knowledge Manager for
benefit plans and Manager Advisor for performance reviews, while Compensation Advisor
helped her get out from under the bonus problem. Compensation Advisor now calculates
bonuses, processes merit increases and performs other duties.
PepsiAmericas purchased the software for Compensation Advisor,
but Authoria hosts the program off-site. Authoria is responsible for running the
system. Pepsi Americas updates its own information internally.
"Updating the system ourselves is important to us," Sacks says.
The company’s benefits people know benefits, "but they are not particularly
technical. We need someone to manage the system."
That type of flexibility is a hallmark of cutting-edge systems,
as is their ability to save a company from cumbersome and error-prone spreadsheets.
"The last time we used spreadsheets, I think we had an
additional 1,200 checks to send out because of errors," she says. "Contrast that to
February this year: We had no errors; the checks went out on time."
Workforce Management, June 2005, pp. 59-60 --
Subscribe Now!
Douglas P. Shuit is a WorkforceManagement staff writer based in Irvine, California. To comment, e-mail editors@workforce.com.
Next Article: 2. Filling a Gap
Employease can implement its system in four to eight weeks, in contrast to months and sometimes years for larger systems.
Reproductions and distribution of the above article are strictly prohibited. To order reprints and/or request permission to use the article in full or partial format, please contact our Reprint Sales Manager at (732) 723-0569.
Comments
Guidelines: Comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed
from the site. We will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies
or any other policies governing this site. You are fully responsible for the content you post.