t’s been nearly one week since Starbucks briefly shut down its stores and reintroduced
its baristas to the fine art of brewing specialty coffees. Now, the question for
the Seattle-based coffee retailer is simple: Do customers notice discernible improvements
in their Starbucks experience, or does the employee training amount to little more
than froth and foam?
Starbucks closed all 7,100 company-operated stores for three hours
on February 26 in what returning CEO Howard Schultz described as a "comprehensive
educational curriculum for all U.S. store partners." Its ostensible goal was to
"provide a renewed focus on espresso standards" and reignite employees’ enthusiasm
for customer service, Schultz said in a statement.
"We are very pleased with how the training went. We’ve heard from
[store employees] that they appreciated the time to focus on espresso excellence
and refresh their skills," Starbucks spokesperson Bridget Baker told Workforce Management.
Although the stated emphasis was on creating perfectly blended caffeine
concoctions, experts say there is a distinct marketing angle behind the well-publicized
sessions, which centered on 135,000 store employees. It enables Starbucks to highlight
employees’ coffee-making expertise while helping reposition the brand amid flagging
sales and stepped-up competition.
It fits nicely with Schultz’s "third place" strategy, says Terry
Schindler, a professor of management at the University of Indianapolis.
"Schultz wants Starbucks to be the third place where people congregate
over a cup of coffee, besides home and work," Schindler says, and that means delivering
a blend of coffees that is superior to its competitors.
Like other high-end retailers, Starbucks faces an uncertain economy.
People are guarding their disposable income, rightfully fretful about gasoline that
has gone north of $3 a gallon in many parts of the country and worried about whether
the economy is sliding into recession.
Against that backdrop, many consumers may view Starbucks’ $4 lattes
as a luxury they can’t afford. Moreover, on-the-go coffee drinkers have lots of
other choices, thanks to McDonald’s and Dunkin Donuts, both of which have launched
their own lines of lower-priced specialty beverages.
McDonald’s, in particular, is proving to be a thorn in Starbucks’
side. Consumer Reports named McDonald’s premium roast coffee the best in a recent
taste test, beating out Starbucks, Dunkin Donuts and Burger King.
Losing to a fast-food chain had to be a crushing blow, and probably
contributed to Starbucks’ decision to make a big deal out of its barista training.
Starbucks also hopes to milk the extensive press coverage of its in-store training
to reinvigorate its brand, an approach that Schindler says is especially critical
since the company doesn’t advertise much.
Perhaps taking a cue from Dunkin Donuts, which Schindler says derives
70 percent of its revenue from coffee sales, Starbucks is returning to its roots
by selling mostly coffee and eliminating items such as warm breakfast sandwiches.
Also in the works are plans to sell $1 cups of coffee with free refills, following
in the steps of McDonald’s—and to offer free wireless Internet access to entice
customers to linger longer.
Starbucks touts itself as a company big on social responsibility
and cementing long-term relationships with customers and employees, but when it
came to talking about the training, employees were instructed to be closemouthed
with the media.
Jess Carpenter, who manages a Starbucks store in Richmond, Virginia,
declined to answer questions about the in-store training when contacted by Workforce
Management.
Starbucks’ corporate line is that the training will pay immediate
dividends. Says spokesperson Baker: "We believe that the investment made in this
training will have a significant impact on our customers’ experience. After completing
the training, our partners signed a promise to exceed customers' expectations by
delivering the perfect drink every time."
The signed pledges will be prominently displayed at Starbucks stores,
Baker says.
Alex Frankel learned about Starbucks’ culture and approach to training
during a three-month stint at a San Francisco-area store in 2005. Unbeknownst to
Starbucks management, Frankel applied to work at the store as research for his book
Punching In. Frankel’s research for the book also included brief stints at other
well-known companies, including Gap, UPS and Enterprise Rent-A-Car.
Frankel says he was surprised at how little formal training he received
upon being hired at Starbucks. He was handed several training manuals and given
time to leaf through them at work, "but that didn’t really teach me very much about
the skills I’d need."
Most of his learning occurred on the job, but little formal instruction
was offered on the art and chemistry of Starbucks’ various brews. For example, the
longest training session Frankel attended was a four-hour orientation that revolved
mostly around instilling the company’s corporate values.
Frankel says Starbucks is feeling the effect of years of rapid expansion,
a situation that points up the need for more and better training.
"They’ve had to relax their hiring standards the last few years
as they’ve grown so quickly. That essentially is what they are paying the price
for now," Frankel says.
In fact, Starbucks plans to open 2,150 new stores globally in 2008,
about 650 of which will be company-operated locations in the U.S., according to
recent financial statement filed with U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. Another
525 U.S. locations will be run as licensed franchises. Through December 30, 2007,
Starbucks posted consolidated net revenue of $2.76 billion, a one-year jump of 17
percent.
Starbucks’ three-hour training initiative may be a bit of a gamble,
Schindler says. It could raise questions in the minds of consumers, who otherwise
wouldn’t have thought about quality and service issues.
"The risk is that customers are going to expect things to be much
different" this week and next the weeks after that, Schindler says. They could switch
loyalties if their expectations aren’t met.