Forums
Should review categories be weighted differently?
General Forum
Should review categories be weighted differently?
Discuss workforce management, performance management, retention, communication, motivation, contributing to business results and other topics.
Our performance appraisal system currently consists of 8 categories (attitude, job knowledge, etc.) and thus all count the same. I've proposed a change, where the employee, myself and their manager ag
1
Cat:Topic ForumsForum:ForumId53
Cat:Topic ForumsForum:ForumId53Discussion:DiscussionId37003
1
|
Should review categories be weighted differently?
posted at 5/24/2011 9:39 AM EDT
|
|
Posts: 544
First: 9/27/2004
Last: 9/13/2011
|
and what about gaming the system? that could be good or bad. One one hand the employee may have to stop relying on being a nice person and actually learn a new skill, but on the other hand it could encourage your divas to become more "diva-ant" - we all know what that's like.
|
2
|
Should review categories be weighted differently?
posted at 5/24/2011 10:23 AM EDT
|
|
Posts: 8
First: 5/18/2011
Last: 8/12/2011
|
Thanks all. The company only has about 20 employees and only about 3 or 4 positions duplicate (primarily case monitors and admin staff). The fact that they got to choose their percentages (within reason) made it a bit easier, but there is still resistance (now from 2 people). I had already linked the weights to their job descriptions (especially if I needed to adjust anything). If people have the same position, their % will be the same as their peer.
Deltac is right- the math is simple and hard to mess up if you've done them enough.
I'm not familiar with the term 'gaming the system' but I think I have enough talking points. Ultimately management is behind it, so if this employee doesn't want to play ball, I'll turn it over to them. Thanks for all the input.
|
3
|
Should review categories be weighted differently?
posted at 5/24/2011 1:19 PM EDT
|
|
Posts: 544
First: 9/27/2004
Last: 9/13/2011
|
Gaming teh system is like "teaching to the test" if people know that a particular thing is given more value, that will become their focus.
This is good if that is what you hope to achieve, but bad because it could encourage "divas" - people who slack in certain areas because they excel at others. This kind of behavior can destroy teamwork.
|
4
|
Should review categories be weighted differently?
posted at 6/10/2011 5:27 AM EDT
|
|
Posts: 3
First: 4/22/2010
Last: 6/10/2011
|
Each job category is different and categories should be weighted differently to reflect levels of importance (e.g. Customer Service is key in one job, not too important in another). The same job should have the same weightings for everyone in the category, and weightings should be consistent one cycle to the next. (ps: I don't believe you should rate "Attitude"; only rate observable behaviors.
|
5
|
Should review categories be weighted differently?
posted at 6/10/2011 5:51 AM EDT
|
|
Posts: 544
First: 9/27/2004
Last: 9/13/2011
|
why not, it's always better to ignore that 800 pound moose sitting on the table...
|
Daily Q&A
How to Address Flagging Motivation?
How do I increase motivation levels in the department? How do I brand my business unit as an attractive place to work? I have top-notch IT professionals in my business unit who feel they are "children of a lesser God" because they are non-billable resources and do not get plum postings abroad, nor the glamour that goes with them. As a result, their motivation suffers.
—-- Feeling Their Pain, human resources generalist, software/services, Mumbai, India
Read Answer
Stay Connected
Join our community for unlimited access to the latest tips, news and information in the HR world.