Forums
Selection System
Recruiting & Staffing
Selection System
Exchange ideas about sourcing, screening, interviewing, finding passive candidates, measuring your results, and more.
Hello all, couple of questions concerning selection. When using a multiple hurdle approach consisting of an intelligence test, personality test, and structured interview, what is the best way to combi
0
Cat:Topic ForumsForum:ForumId56
Cat:Topic ForumsForum:ForumId56Discussion:DiscussionId35692
1
|
Selection System
posted at 3/29/2009 4:59 PM EDT
|
|
Posts: 1
First: 3/29/2009
Last: 3/29/2009
|
Hello all, couple of questions concerning selection. When using a multiple hurdle approach consisting of an intelligence test, personality test, and structured interview, what is the best way to combine scores for applicants? Also, when using a panel of interviewers, what is the best way to combine their scores for a final interview score?
|
2
|
Selection System
posted at 3/30/2009 6:20 AM EDT
|
|
Posts: 79
First: 3/19/2008
Last: 10/15/2009
|
As far as the multiple hurdle approach, how you combine the scores depends on two things 1) what is the correlation of the 3 tests with each other and 2) what is the predictive value of each test (with job performance).
I know this answer is probably too technical and not practical, but you need to consider the value of each assessment seperately. They probably overlap quite a bit. Typically the interview is assessing the same things as the written tests and really does not add much value. But of course it depends.
|
3
|
Selection System
posted at 3/30/2009 7:39 AM EDT
|
|
Posts: 410
First: 1/26/2006
Last: 11/15/2010
|
Hi:
By definition, a multiple hurdle approach to selection entails having the applicant clear each hurdle before progressing to the next hurdle. Hence, the multiple hurdle approach does not involve combining and weighting scores from various hiring procedures.
In contrast, a compensatory approach to selection allows the applicant to be evaluated on a composite of hiring tools (e.g., tests, interviews) at one time. Such an approach is compensatory in nature insofar as low scores on an interview can be compensated for by high scores on a test or other selection tool.
When using a compensatory model, the weight placed on each hiring tool should be based on what each tool assessess and the importance of that particular trait/behavior/characteristic to performing the job.
As an aside, many employers gravitate towards the multiple hurdle model due to the economics. A short online or phone-based questionnaire regarding minimum qualifications and an assessment are often used as hurdles to get to an interview. In this manner, the company saves a significant amount of their recruiters' and managers' time insofar as they are not interviewing candidates who do not meet minimum qualifications.
I trust this information is helpful.
Dave Arnold, Ph.D., J.D.
|
Daily Q&A
How to Address Flagging Motivation?
How do I increase motivation levels in the department? How do I brand my business unit as an attractive place to work? I have top-notch IT professionals in my business unit who feel they are "children of a lesser God" because they are non-billable resources and do not get plum postings abroad, nor the glamour that goes with them. As a result, their motivation suffers.
—-- Feeling Their Pain, human resources generalist, software/services, Mumbai, India
Read Answer
Stay Connected
Join our community for unlimited access to the latest tips, news and information in the HR world.