Quick Takes
Home
Complete archive of features and news articles, sample policies and procedures, assessments, and surveys.
Network and exchange ideas with other members in the forums or ask an expert in one of the hosted forums.
Access vendor directories, product case studies and showcases.
Read Best in Shows, view our conference calendar, read commentaries and take our news poll.
The Hot List
Blogs
Topic Channels
Comp, Benefits, Rewards
HR Management
Legal Insight
Recruiting and Staffing
Software and Technology
Training and Development
= Member Only
Workforce HR Jobs
Post Your Job
Post Your Resume



Subscribe Now
Workforce Magazine
Subscriber Help
























= Member Only


Quick Takes: December 4, 2007
  

Talent Management Plagued by Confusion, Internal Competition


Nearly half of non-HR managers don’t even view talent acquisition as a central component to business strategies, according to an Aberdeen study.
By Garry Kranz
Recommend 0

Talent Tussle: For all the hype about talent management, leaders within companies remain confused about its role in corporate strategy and who is chiefly responsible for its execution. According to Aberdeen Group Inc., 58 percent of human resources executives perceive talent management to be central to overall strategy—a view shared by only 44 percent of non-HR executives. “Confusion over ownership and influence is further compounded” by the fact that company resources typically are allocated to the most pressing issues, such as recruiting the best candidates to apply. An example is that “non-HR executives are 58 percent more likely than HR executives” to recognize when an organization gets flooded with unqualified candidates.

Aberdeen’s report, titled “The Global War for Talent: Getting What You Want Won’t Be Easy,” underscores the need for hiring managers to consult with other key players in mapping out effective talent acquisition. It outlines how companies are struggling with executive-level metrics to measure the effectiveness of their talent management strategies. Again, dichotomies exist between HR executives and those in other areas. For instance, the quality of new hires is cited as the top metric by 63 percent of non-HR execs, compared with 49 percent of HR decision-makers, who say “time to fill” is most important. Only 17 percent of executives outside HR agree.


Workforce Management contributing editor Garry Kranz is based in Richmond, Virginia. E-mail editors@workforce.com to comment.


Next Article >
1 | 2 | 3 | 4
Index: Quick Takes — December 4, 2007

           
E-mail this document Printer-friendly version Write to the Editor Reprint Information

Reproductions and distribution of the above article are strictly prohibited. To order reprints and/or request permission to use the article in full or partial format, please contact our Reprint Sales Manager at (732) 723-0569.


Related Topics









Copyright © 1995-2008 Crain Communications Inc.
All Rights Reserved. Terms of Use Privacy Statement