Talent Management Plagued by Confusion, Internal Competition
Nearly half of non-HR managers don’t even view talent acquisition as a central component to business strategies, according to an Aberdeen study.
By Garry Kranz
Talent Tussle: For all the hype about talent management,
leaders within companies remain confused about its role in corporate strategy
and who is chiefly responsible for its execution. According to Aberdeen Group
Inc., 58 percent of human resources executives perceive talent management to be
central to overall strategy—a view shared by only 44 percent of non-HR
executives. “Confusion over ownership and influence is further compounded” by
the fact that company resources typically are allocated to the most pressing
issues, such as recruiting the best candidates to apply. An example is that
“non-HR executives are 58 percent more likely than HR executives” to recognize
when an organization gets flooded with unqualified candidates.
Aberdeen’s report, titled “The Global War for Talent: Getting What You Want
Won’t Be Easy,” underscores the need for hiring managers to consult with other
key players in mapping out effective talent acquisition. It outlines how
companies are struggling with executive-level metrics to measure the
effectiveness of their talent management strategies. Again, dichotomies exist
between HR executives and those in other areas. For instance, the quality of new
hires is cited as the top metric by 63 percent of non-HR execs, compared with 49
percent of HR decision-makers, who say “time to fill” is most important. Only 17
percent of executives outside HR agree.
Workforce Management contributing editor Garry Kranz is based in Richmond, Virginia. E-mail editors@workforce.com to comment.
Next Article >
1 |
2 |
3 |
4
Index: Quick Takes December 4, 2007
|