Quick Takes
Home
Complete archive of features and news articles, sample policies and procedures, assessments, and surveys.
Network and exchange ideas with other members in the forums or ask an expert in one of the hosted forums.
Access vendor directories, product case studies and showcases.
Read Best in Shows, view our conference calendar, read commentaries and take our news poll.
The Hot List
Blogs
Topic Channels
Comp, Benefits, Rewards
HR Management
Legal Insight
Recruiting and Staffing
Software and Technology
Training and Development
= Member Only
Workforce HR Jobs
Find A Job
Post A Job



Subscribe Now
Workforce Magazine
Subscriber Help
























= Member Only


Quick Takes: April 15, 2008
  

Georgia Justices: Let Corporate Slander Suit Be Heard


Previously dismissed by two lower courts, the legal wrangling can resume against mortgage company Amerisave.
By Garry Kranz
Comments 0 | Recommend 0

You Can’t Say That: Slander allegations made by an ex-employee of Amerisave Mortgage Corp. will be heard in court after all, following a decision by the Supreme Court of Georgia that overturns a lower court’s ruling to dismiss the lawsuit. The case stems from allegations made by Stephen Scouten that Amerisave and its business associates allegedly “defamed him by disseminating false information” to employees that he was terminated for theft, according to court transcripts and published reports.

Scouten’s allegations were contained in a lawsuit that had been dismissed by a lower Georgia court. An appeals court subsequently also upheld the lower court’s dismissal. But Supreme Court justices ruled in February that “construing these allegations most favorably to Scouten, it is possible that he could introduce evidence within the framework of the complaint establishing that defamatory statements were disseminated to Amerisave employees who had no duty or authority giving them reason to receive the information.”

Also, the justices unanimously wrote: “Accordingly, the complaint sufficiently states a claim for relief based on defamation, including the required element of publication, and it was [an] error to dismiss this claim.” Amerisave is not commenting publicly on the matter.


Workforce Management contributing editor Garry Kranz is based in Richmond, Virginia. E-mail editors@workforce.com to comment.


< Previous Article | Next Article >
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5
Index: Quick Takes — April 15, 2008

           
E-mail this document Printer-friendly version Write to the Editor Reprint Information

Reproductions and distribution of the above article are strictly prohibited. To order reprints and/or request permission to use the article in full or partial format, please contact our Reprint Sales Manager at (732) 723-0569.


Comments

Guidelines: Comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. We will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. You are fully responsible for the content you post.



Related Topics









Copyright © 1995-2009 Crain Communications Inc.
All Rights Reserved. Terms of Use Privacy Statement