Quick Takes
Home
Complete archive of features and news articles, sample policies and procedures, assessments, and surveys.
Network and exchange ideas with other members in the forums or ask an expert in one of the hosted forums.
Access vendor directories, product case studies and showcases.
Read Best in Shows, view our conference calendar, read commentaries and take our news poll.
The Hot List
Blogs
Topic Channels
Comp, Benefits, Rewards
HR Management
Legal Insight
Recruiting and Staffing
Software and Technology
Training and Development
= Member Only
Workforce HR Jobs
Find A Job
Post A Job



Subscribe Now
Workforce Magazine
Subscriber Help
























= Member Only


Quick Takes: July 22, 2008
  

Merger Meltdown Spawns Years of Turnover


Acquired companies lose nearly one-quarter of their top brass each year in the decade after a failed acquisition.
By Garry Kranz
Comments 0 | Recommend 0

Lasting Impact: When a merger fails, companies feel the effects for years, resulting in unusually high turnover and other negative business consequences, according to researchers at Virginia Commonwealth University in Richmond. Companies that are the object of such takeovers lose 21 percent of their executives each year for at least 10 years. That’s more than double the turnover of nonmerged companies. The findings, contained in the report “The Big Exit: Executive Churn in the Wake of M&As,” underscore the correlation between loss of top executives and a company’s poor performance, its authors say.

Lead author Jeffrey Krug, an associate professor of strategic management in the VCU School of Business, cites three main reasons for the abnormally high executive attrition in the wake of mergers. He notes that many companies tend to “rotate their executives” to add value and fresh insights to the acquired company, although these short-term assignments often hinder effective integration. Second, more than half of all mergers “fail to live up to expectations,” prompting acquiring companies to restructure or divest “underperforming targets a few years after the acquisition.” Another hindrance: When supervisors leave, managers often don’t get the “managerial discretion” on decision-making they need to be effective leaders.

Krug and co-author Walt Shill, a managing director at Accenture, based the research on the turnover patterns at more than 1,000 firms. They also examined the employment of more than 23,000 executives. The full study appears in the July/August issue of the Journal of Business Strategy.


Workforce Management contributing editor Garry Kranz is based in Richmond, Virginia. E-mail editors@workforce.com to comment.


< Previous Article | Next Article >
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5
Index: Quick Takes — July 22, 2008

           
E-mail this document Printer-friendly version Write to the Editor Reprint Information

Reproductions and distribution of the above article are strictly prohibited. To order reprints and/or request permission to use the article in full or partial format, please contact our Reprint Sales Manager at (732) 723-0569.


Comments

Guidelines: Comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. We will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. You are fully responsible for the content you post.



Related Topics









Copyright © 1995-2009 Crain Communications Inc.
All Rights Reserved. Terms of Use Privacy Statement