Enforcing noncompete agreements are anything but routine, and their enforceability varies greatly from state to state.
If your business operates in more than one location, you cannot ignore this case or its implications.
Allen v. City of Chicago still is not a clear win for employers across the board.
We have come a long way since ignorance labeled AIDS 'gay cancer.' Still, HIV and AIDS carry a certain stigma, which employers must avoid.
Comply with the EEOC regulations, because unless you’re Bugs Bunny, the hawk always wins.
The FCRA doesn't regulate how employers use background checks but instead regulates the hoops through which an employer must jump to use legally obtain them.
It appears that Ohio’s proposed off-duty conduct law is a whole lot worse for employers than Colorado’s similar (but very different) statute.
Kevin Stuckey, an African-American, worked for AutoZone Inc. as a salesperson and then as a manager. During his employment, Stuckey was transferred to multiple stores in Chicago. Following his transfer in July 2012, in which his pay and job responsibilities were supposed to remain the same, Stuckey never returned to work. Instead he filed a U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission charge of discrimination claiming that his transfer was initiated because of his race. The EEOC filed a lawsuit on Stuckey’s behalf, claiming that Stuckey’s transfer was part of a plan to “limit, segregate or classify” employees on the basis of race. The U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois granted summary judgment to AutoZone, holding that even in a disparate impact case, the employees must show that they suffered an adverse action. The court held that there was no evidence that Stuckey’s transfer resulted in an objectively humiliating or degrading change in working conditions. EEOC v. AutoZone Inc., No. 14-cv-5579(Aug. 4, 2015).
IMPACT: Transferring employees to different locations is a legitimate business reason as long as it does not result in an objectively humiliating or degrading change in working conditions for the employee based on some protected classification such as race or sex.
Mark T. Kobata and Marty Denis are partners in the law firm Barlow, Kobata and Denis, which has offices in Beverly Hills, California, and Chicago.To comment, email email@example.com.
Here are two key categories: What is work? And who is an employee?
Legalities aside, this issue asks a larger question: What kind of employer do you want to be?