Top
Stories

Featured Article Getting Minorities to Buy In on Retirement February 13, 2012
Featured Article State Law Favored Over Feds in Overtime Case February 12, 2012
Featured Article Adopting a Social Media Mind-Set February 12, 2012
Featured Article Social Media and Collaboration Tools February 12, 2012
Featured Article Arbitration Pact Barring Class Lawsuits Violates NLRA February 12, 2012
Featured Article The Last Word: Backyard Retirement Plan February 11, 2012
Featured Article State Public Sector Retirement Plan Roundup February 10, 2012
Featured Article States Taking a Hard Look at Pensions February 10, 2012
Featured Article Wisconsin's Tough Choice February 10, 2012
Featured Article Small Employers Exploring Health Care Exchange Options February 8, 2012

Latest News

Legislation Seeks to Set $5 Million Floor on Lifetime Coverage Limits

The bill’s sponsor cites the cost of medical treatments that result from disabilities or chronic illness.

  • July 29, 2008
  • Comments (0)

Proposed federal legislation could prohibit employers from imposing a lifetime coverage limit of less than $5 million per employee.

Introduced July 17 by Rep. Anna Eshoo, D-California, the proposed amendment to the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 would set the lifetime coverage limit at a minimum of $5 million for employees, an amount that would eventually go up to $10 million per employee.

The law would not apply to small employers with fewer than 20 employees.

Eshoo, who introduced the legislation with Reps. Jim Langevin, D-Rhode Island, Betty Sutton, D-Ohio, and Jason Altmire, D-Pennsylvania, said in a statement posted on her Web site: “As medical treatment costs continue to increase, the issue of lifetime insurance maximums will become even more important. My legislation will protect individuals who are struggling to pay for the expensive medical treatments that are a result of a disability or chronic illness.”

Health insurance lobbying group America’s Health Insurance Plans criticized the proposed legislation for recognizing only that costs were increasing without addressing ways to reduce health care costs.

—Jeremy Smerd

Leave A Comment

Guidelines: Comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. We will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. You are fully responsible for the content you post.

Daily Q&A

What Can We Do When an Employee Has Exhausted the Leave-of-Absence Time Allowed by Our Workers' Comp Policy?

We have an employee who has been on workers' compensation for two years now—the claim is grandfathered under our old policy, but it's since changed. Now, when injured employees are on workers' compensation, they receive two-thirds of their pay and must use sick days and vacation to cover the remaining one-third. May we begin requiring the injured employee to use personal time?

—Sick About This, benefits coordinator, mining/oil/gas, Illinois

Read Answer

Stay Connected

Join our community for unlimited access to the latest tips, news and information in the HR world.

HR Jobs

View All Job Listings

Search