Top
Stories

Featured Article Getting Minorities to Buy In on Retirement February 13, 2012
Featured Article State Law Favored Over Feds in Overtime Case February 12, 2012
Featured Article Adopting a Social Media Mind-Set February 12, 2012
Featured Article Social Media and Collaboration Tools February 12, 2012
Featured Article Arbitration Pact Barring Class Lawsuits Violates NLRA February 12, 2012
Featured Article The Last Word: Backyard Retirement Plan February 11, 2012
Featured Article State Public Sector Retirement Plan Roundup February 10, 2012
Featured Article States Taking a Hard Look at Pensions February 10, 2012
Featured Article Wisconsin's Tough Choice February 10, 2012
Featured Article Small Employers Exploring Health Care Exchange Options February 8, 2012

Latest News

Executives Skeptical of Candidates’ Health Plans

Nearly three-quarters of corporate benefit executives say that taxing employees on the value of employer-provided health care benefit programs would have a negative effect on employees, according to a new survey.

  • September 16, 2008
  • Comments (0)

Nearly three-quarters of corporate benefit executives say that taxing employees on the value of employer-provided health care benefit programs would have a negative effect on employees, according to a new survey.

Such a proposal is part of the health care reform platform endorsed by Sen. John McCain, R-Arizona, the Republican Party’s presidential candidate. McCain has proposed giving all taxpayers tax credits to offset the cost of health insurance premiums. The tax credit would be $2,500 for individual coverage and $5,000 for family coverage.

In turn, employees who receive coverage from their employers would be taxed on employer-paid premiums. McCain has said such a change in tax law would result in more equity between those who receive coverage from their employers and those who buy coverage on their own and under current law receive no tax breaks for obtaining the coverage.

But according to the survey conducted by the law firm Miller & Chevalier Chartered and the American Benefits Council, both based in Washington, 74 percent of corporate benefit executives said such a change would have a negative impact on employees.

A substantial number, 46 percent, of benefit executives also said requiring employers to offer health care coverage or pay a new tax—an idea endorsed by Democratic Party presidential nominee Sen. Barack Obama of Illinois—would have a strong negative effect on their workforces.

“This feedback should be a wake-up call to our political leaders that the people responsible for structuring and managing employer-sponsored health plans … are deeply skeptical about key elements of both presidential candidates’ reform proposals. Rather than taxing workers’ health benefits [or] compelling employers to provide coverage they can’t afford, candidates should focus on initiatives to control costs and promote top-quality care,” said American Benefits Council President James A. Klein in a statement.

The survey is based on the responses of 187 benefits executives.

The survey is available at www.millerchevalier.com or www.americanbenefitscouncil.org.

Filed by Jerry Geisel of Business Insurance, a sister publication of Workforce Management. To comment, e-mail editors@workforce.com.

Workforce Management's online news feed is now available via Twitter.

Leave A Comment

Guidelines: Comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. We will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. You are fully responsible for the content you post.

Daily Q&A

What Can We Do When an Employee Has Exhausted the Leave-of-Absence Time Allowed by Our Workers' Comp Policy?

We have an employee who has been on workers' compensation for two years now—the claim is grandfathered under our old policy, but it's since changed. Now, when injured employees are on workers' compensation, they receive two-thirds of their pay and must use sick days and vacation to cover the remaining one-third. May we begin requiring the injured employee to use personal time?

—Sick About This, benefits coordinator, mining/oil/gas, Illinois

Read Answer

Stay Connected

Join our community for unlimited access to the latest tips, news and information in the HR world.

HR Jobs

View All Job Listings

Search