Top
Stories

Featured Article Getting Minorities to Buy In on Retirement February 13, 2012
Featured Article State Law Favored Over Feds in Overtime Case February 12, 2012
Featured Article Adopting a Social Media Mind-Set February 12, 2012
Featured Article Social Media and Collaboration Tools February 12, 2012
Featured Article Arbitration Pact Barring Class Lawsuits Violates NLRA February 12, 2012
Featured Article The Last Word: Backyard Retirement Plan February 11, 2012
Featured Article State Public Sector Retirement Plan Roundup February 10, 2012
Featured Article States Taking a Hard Look at Pensions February 10, 2012
Featured Article Wisconsin's Tough Choice February 10, 2012
Featured Article Small Employers Exploring Health Care Exchange Options February 8, 2012
Featured Article Tech Talk February 8, 2012

Latest News

Colorado Unions, Employers Settle Ballot Dispute

Four proposed constitutional amendments that organizations representing Colorado employers said would have had a devastating impact on businesses in the state have been withdrawn from November's ballot.

  • October 3, 2008
  • Comments (0)

Four proposed constitutional amendments that organizations representing Colorado employers said would have had a devastating impact on businesses in the state have been withdrawn from November's ballot, after a deal worked out with labor supporters that had proposed them.

A spokeswoman for the Denver Metro Chamber of Commerce said the amendments were withdrawn in exchange for $3 million in funding from businesses to support union opposition to proposed anti-union laws. The spokeswoman said the chamber was not contributing to the fund.

The amendments would have eliminated "at will" employment in the state and require private employers to have a "just cause" before terminating employees; mandate that all companies with at least 20 employees provide health insurance for workers and their dependents; remove the workers compensation "exclusive remedy" provision; and hold corporate officials criminally liable for illegal company activities.

Opponents of the amendments called them a poison pill by labor supporters as part of a strategy to have the anti-union measures withdrawn. The measures included a right-to-work provision banning compulsory union membership.

Filed by Judy Greenwald of Business Insurance, a sister publication of Workforce Management. To comment, e-mail editors@workforce.com.

Workforce Management's online news feed is now available via Twitter.

Leave A Comment

Guidelines: Comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. We will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. You are fully responsible for the content you post.

Daily Q&A

Are We the Only Company Laboring to Manage Our Expats?

How do we better manage our expat process? Ideally, we'd like to have some type of case-management tool that enables us to make sure we place the right people in the right overseas assignment. Could you share some pointers on how we can make sure the expat process we use works to the benefit of our company and our expats?

—Gone but Not Forgotten, HR consultant, Montreal

Read Answer

Stay Connected

Join our community for unlimited access to the latest tips, news and information in the HR world.

HR Jobs

View All Job Listings

Search