Top
Stories

Featured Article Getting Minorities to Buy In on Retirement February 13, 2012
Featured Article State Law Favored Over Feds in Overtime Case February 12, 2012
Featured Article Adopting a Social Media Mind-Set February 12, 2012
Featured Article Social Media and Collaboration Tools February 12, 2012
Featured Article Arbitration Pact Barring Class Lawsuits Violates NLRA February 12, 2012
Featured Article The Last Word: Backyard Retirement Plan February 11, 2012
Featured Article State Public Sector Retirement Plan Roundup February 10, 2012
Featured Article States Taking a Hard Look at Pensions February 10, 2012
Featured Article Wisconsin's Tough Choice February 10, 2012
Featured Article Small Employers Exploring Health Care Exchange Options February 8, 2012

Latest News

Automatic Enrollment Boosting 401(k) Participation

More than 81 percent of eligible workers had balances in plans in 2007. ‘Back sweeping’ still uncommon.

  • October 6, 2008
  • Comments (0)

There’s more evidence that growth in 401(k) plan participants with account balances is dovetailing with the increase in plans using automatic enrollment

 

More than four out of five eligible employees had balances in their 401(k) plans in 2007, up from 78.9 percent in 2006, with increased employer use of automatic enrollment accounting for the rise, according to a recent survey by the Profit Sharing/401(k) Council of America in Chicago. 

 

“More than half of large plans utilize this feature, and usage by small plans doubled,” PSCA president David Wray said in a news release about the survey. 

 

That comes as no surprise to Pamela Hess, director of retirement research at Hewitt Associates Inc. in Lincolnshire, Illinois. She said automatic enrollment can increase employee participation by as much as 20 percent, based on Hewitt’s research. 

 

“It [auto-enrollment] is an increasing trend,” Hess said. “When you default employees into automatic enrollment plans, you absolutely get a participation-rate increase.” 

 

Still, further gains in employee participation could be had if pension-plan executives went back to existing employees who aren’t participating in the plan and re-enrolled them into 401(k) plans, Hess said. 

 

“Most companies do not ‘back sweep’ [enroll employees who declined participation initially] and enrolling existing hires will be much more painful,” Hess said. “Paychecks will go down for existing employees, while for new hires the money is never there to miss.” 

 

Jamie Kalamarides, senior vice president for Prudential Retirement Services in Hartford, Connecticut, said that once new employees are enrolled into a company’s retirement plan, plan officials should use automatic escalation, raising employee contributions to ensure adequate and increased retirement funds are available for employees. 

 

“Those two things [auto-enrollment and auto-escalation] combined will help participants make the right decisions and create the right inertia in savings for the future,” Kalamarides said. 

 

Hess cautioned that more employees enrolling in a company’s retirement plan and automatic increases in contributions could mean higher costs to a company in matching contributions and a potential strain on company profits. 

 

“Some companies just cannot afford to re-enroll existing employees due to these higher matching contribution costs,” she said. 

 

The PSCA survey also reported that the typical 401(k) plan has 65 percent of assets in equities, unchanged from 2006. Assets most frequently are invested in active domestic equity funds, followed by indexed domestic equity funds, stable-value funds and balanced stock/bond funds.

Pensions & Investments, a sister publication of Workforce Management. To comment, e-mail editors@workforce.com.

Workforce Management’s online news feed is now available via Twitter.

Leave A Comment

Guidelines: Comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. We will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. You are fully responsible for the content you post.

Daily Q&A

What Can We Do When an Employee Has Exhausted the Leave-of-Absence Time Allowed by Our Workers' Comp Policy?

We have an employee who has been on workers' compensation for two years now—the claim is grandfathered under our old policy, but it's since changed. Now, when injured employees are on workers' compensation, they receive two-thirds of their pay and must use sick days and vacation to cover the remaining one-third. May we begin requiring the injured employee to use personal time?

—Sick About This, benefits coordinator, mining/oil/gas, Illinois

Read Answer

Stay Connected

Join our community for unlimited access to the latest tips, news and information in the HR world.

HR Jobs

View All Job Listings

Search