Top
Stories

Featured Article Getting Minorities to Buy In on Retirement February 13, 2012
Featured Article State Law Favored Over Feds in Overtime Case February 12, 2012
Featured Article Adopting a Social Media Mind-Set February 12, 2012
Featured Article Social Media and Collaboration Tools February 12, 2012
Featured Article Arbitration Pact Barring Class Lawsuits Violates NLRA February 12, 2012
Featured Article The Last Word: Backyard Retirement Plan February 11, 2012
Featured Article State Public Sector Retirement Plan Roundup February 10, 2012
Featured Article States Taking a Hard Look at Pensions February 10, 2012
Featured Article Wisconsin's Tough Choice February 10, 2012
Featured Article Small Employers Exploring Health Care Exchange Options February 8, 2012

Latest News

10th Circuit Overturns ADA Bias Ruling

The October 15 ruling in Wyoming District Court held that the employer discriminated against Ireane Kellogg, a safety technician, in violation of the ADA when it fired her after she was diagnosed with epilepsy.

  • October 17, 2008
  • Comments (0)

Driving is not a major life activity under the Americans with Disabilities Act, even in rural Wyoming, where public transportation is virtually nonexistent and distances between towns are measured by hours rather than miles, an appellate court has ruled.

The October 15 ruling in Kellogg v. Energy Safety Services Inc. overturns a Wyoming District Court ruling that held the employer discriminated against Ireane Kellogg, a safety technician, in violation of the ADA when it fired her after she was diagnosed with epilepsy.

Energy Safety Services, an Arizona corporation doing business as Oilind Safety, is an industrial-safety company that provides training, environmental monitoring and other services to industrial customers. As part of her job, Kellogg traveled by company truck from the company’s Worland, Wyoming, office, to oilfields to provide services to clients. After her diagnosis, however, Kellogg’s doctor issued her a note ordering her not to drive until he decided it was safe.

Kellogg sued her employer in U.S. District Court in Cheyenne, Wyoming, on May 5, 2006, alleging discrimination under the ADA as well as violations of the Fair Labor Standards Act, saying she was entitled to overtime compensation that had not been paid. The jury found on her behalf on both claims and awarded her damages. In addition, the district court awarded Kellogg prejudgment interest, front pay under the ADA, liquidated damages under the Fair Labor Standards Act and attorney fees.

Oilind appealed, and a three-judge panel of the10th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Denver on Wednesday, October 15, vacated the jury’s verdict on the ADA claim and remanded the case for a new trial, but it upheld the Fair Labor Standards Act verdict and the district court’s award of liquidated damages. Circuit Judge William Judson Holloway Jr. dissented.

Plaintiff’s attorney Bruce S. Asay of Associated Legal Group in Cheyenne said he had not yet discussed with his client whether to seek a rehearing by the full 10th Circuit or to proceed with a new trial.

“Since Wyoming is such a rural state, the court should have found that driving is a major life activity under the ADA,” he said.

Defendant’s attorney Catherine MacPherson, of MacPherson, Kelly & Thompson in Rawlins, Wyoming, was unavailable for comment.

Filed by Joanne Wojcik of Business Insurance, a sister publication of Workforce Management. To comment, e-mail editors@workforce.com.

Workforce Management’s online news feed is now available via Twitter.

 

Leave A Comment

Guidelines: Comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. We will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. You are fully responsible for the content you post.

Daily Q&A

What Can We Do When an Employee Has Exhausted the Leave-of-Absence Time Allowed by Our Workers' Comp Policy?

We have an employee who has been on workers' compensation for two years now—the claim is grandfathered under our old policy, but it's since changed. Now, when injured employees are on workers' compensation, they receive two-thirds of their pay and must use sick days and vacation to cover the remaining one-third. May we begin requiring the injured employee to use personal time?

—Sick About This, benefits coordinator, mining/oil/gas, Illinois

Read Answer

Stay Connected

Join our community for unlimited access to the latest tips, news and information in the HR world.

HR Jobs

View All Job Listings

Search