Top
Stories

Featured Article Getting Minorities to Buy In on Retirement February 13, 2012
Featured Article State Law Favored Over Feds in Overtime Case February 12, 2012
Featured Article Adopting a Social Media Mind-Set February 12, 2012
Featured Article Social Media and Collaboration Tools February 12, 2012
Featured Article Arbitration Pact Barring Class Lawsuits Violates NLRA February 12, 2012
Featured Article The Last Word: Backyard Retirement Plan February 11, 2012
Featured Article State Public Sector Retirement Plan Roundup February 10, 2012
Featured Article States Taking a Hard Look at Pensions February 10, 2012
Featured Article Wisconsin's Tough Choice February 10, 2012
Featured Article Small Employers Exploring Health Care Exchange Options February 8, 2012

Latest News

AIG Freezes Executives’ Employment Packages

New York’s attorney general says American International Group Inc. has agreed to freeze the $19 million plus other benefits provided for former CEO Martin Sullivan in his employment package.

  • October 23, 2008
  • Comments (0)

New York Attorney General Andrew M. Cuomo said American International Group Inc. has agreed to freeze the $19 million plus other benefits provided for former CEO Martin Sullivan in his employment package.

In a letter Wednesday, October 22, to current AIG chairman and CEO Edward M. Liddy, and at a press conference, Cuomo said AIG also has agreed that no funds would be distributed out of the $600 million deferred compensation and bonus pools of AIG’s Financial Products subsidiary, which was the source of the credit default swaps that have caused the insurer’s current problems.

“It is my understanding that Joseph Cassano, the former head of the subsidiary, has a share totaling approximately $69 million of these funds,” said Cuomo in his letter. “In addition, after Cassano, five other top executives in AIG Financial Products have a combined share in these funds totaling approximately $93 million.

“The American taxpayer is now supporting AIG, making the preservation of these taxpayer funds a vital obligation and a priority responsibility of your company,” Cuomo said in his letter. “Taxpayers are, in many ways, now like shareholders of your company, and the new AIG has a responsibility to them in the first instance.”

At the press conference, Cuomo was asked whether he would pursue payments that have been made to former chairman and CEO Maurice R. Greenberg. Cuomo responded, “We have a separate case pending against Mr. Greenberg, and that’s been an ongoing matter.”

At the conference, Cuomo said, “My position is, until the taxpayers recoup their investment in AIG, which is now $120 billion, plus interest, there should not be any contemplation of … executive bonuses, because I find it hard to conceive of a situation where executives could justify performance bonuses for management that virtually bankrupts the company. I don’t want to add insult to injury.”

Cuomo said his first step would be to freeze compensation and bonuses. Step two, he said, “which is more ambitious,” is to determine “to what extent you can actually recapture money that has already been paid,” which is an issue that is now being reviewed under New York's Uniform Fraudulent Conveyance Act.

“Everyone’s talking about toxic assets,” he said. “But let’s also realize there were toxic practices that created the problem of the toxic assets.”

Last week, Liddy agreed to help Cuomo recover bonuses and other payments to former executives. Liddy also agreed to end “all junkets and perks” for executives, canceling scores of planned AIG events that would have cost the company more than $8 million.

Filed by Judy Greenwald of Business Insurance, a sister publication of Workforce Management. To comment, e-mail editors@workforce.com.

Workforce Management’s online news feed is now available via Twitter. 

Leave A Comment

Guidelines: Comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. We will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. You are fully responsible for the content you post.

Daily Q&A

What Can We Do When an Employee Has Exhausted the Leave-of-Absence Time Allowed by Our Workers' Comp Policy?

We have an employee who has been on workers' compensation for two years now—the claim is grandfathered under our old policy, but it's since changed. Now, when injured employees are on workers' compensation, they receive two-thirds of their pay and must use sick days and vacation to cover the remaining one-third. May we begin requiring the injured employee to use personal time?

—Sick About This, benefits coordinator, mining/oil/gas, Illinois

Read Answer

Stay Connected

Join our community for unlimited access to the latest tips, news and information in the HR world.

HR Jobs

View All Job Listings

Search