Top
Stories

Featured Article Getting Minorities to Buy In on Retirement February 13, 2012
Featured Article State Law Favored Over Feds in Overtime Case February 12, 2012
Featured Article Adopting a Social Media Mind-Set February 12, 2012
Featured Article Social Media and Collaboration Tools February 12, 2012
Featured Article Arbitration Pact Barring Class Lawsuits Violates NLRA February 12, 2012
Featured Article The Last Word: Backyard Retirement Plan February 11, 2012
Featured Article State Public Sector Retirement Plan Roundup February 10, 2012
Featured Article States Taking a Hard Look at Pensions February 10, 2012
Featured Article Wisconsin's Tough Choice February 10, 2012
Featured Article Small Employers Exploring Health Care Exchange Options February 8, 2012

Latest News

Pension Group Urges Congress to Protect Plan Participants

The organization’s suggestions include blocking funding relief to plans that have frozen benefits and to make relief contingent on an employer’s promise to not freeze plans for five years after the period of funding relief.

  • November 19, 2008
  • Comments (0)

The Pension Rights Center wants Congress to change federal pension laws to protect participants in single-employer defined-benefit plans in response to asset declines caused by the financial crisis.

“As Congress considers new actions to address the economic crisis—by rescuing financial institutions, bailing out the auto industry, and aiding homeowners who face foreclosure—we urge you to also address the equally important issue of erosion in retirement financial security,” said a letter sent to congressional leaders.

The organization urged Congress to block funding relief to plans that have frozen benefits and to make relief contingent on an employer’s promise to not freeze plans for five years after the period of funding relief.

The letter also called for extending the amortization period for funding unfunded liabilities to 10 years from seven and reinstating a pre-Pension Protection Act rule for companies facing bankruptcy to make the effective date the day the company terminates the plan, not the date the employer files for bankruptcy protection. The current system allows bankrupt plan providers to “retroactively strip employees of benefits” when the bankruptcy filing date precedes the termination of the plan by several years. 

The center also wants to ensure that deferred compensation for management and high-paid employees be frozen along with any DB plan freezes.

Filed by Timothy Inklebarger of Pensions & Investments, a sister publication of Workforce Management. To comment, e-mail editors@workforce com.

Workforce Management’s online news feed is now available via Twitter.

 

Leave A Comment

Guidelines: Comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. We will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. You are fully responsible for the content you post.

Daily Q&A

What Can We Do When an Employee Has Exhausted the Leave-of-Absence Time Allowed by Our Workers' Comp Policy?

We have an employee who has been on workers' compensation for two years now—the claim is grandfathered under our old policy, but it's since changed. Now, when injured employees are on workers' compensation, they receive two-thirds of their pay and must use sick days and vacation to cover the remaining one-third. May we begin requiring the injured employee to use personal time?

—Sick About This, benefits coordinator, mining/oil/gas, Illinois

Read Answer

Stay Connected

Join our community for unlimited access to the latest tips, news and information in the HR world.

HR Jobs

View All Job Listings

Search