Top
Stories

The Ethical Workplace Blog Blog Going Nuclear—More Safe Power for Georgia's People February 14, 2012
Featured Article Getting Minorities to Buy In on Retirement February 13, 2012
Featured Article State Law Favored Over Feds in Overtime Case February 12, 2012
Featured Article Adopting a Social Media Mind-Set February 12, 2012
Featured Article Social Media and Collaboration Tools February 12, 2012
Featured Article Arbitration Pact Barring Class Lawsuits Violates NLRA February 12, 2012
Featured Article The Last Word: Backyard Retirement Plan February 11, 2012
Featured Article Wisconsin's Tough Choice February 10, 2012

Latest News

Rules Freeze Affects Risk Management, Benefits

A vast array of proposed rules and regulations that have not been officially adopted or have been recently adopted but not implemented, are now subject to White House review before further action.

  • January 27, 2009
  • Comments (0)

A vast array of proposed rules and regulations that have not been officially adopted or have been recently adopted but not implemented, are now subject to White House review before further action.

A memo issued to federal agencies immediately after President Barack Obama occupied the White House on January 20 freezes implementation of all pending and recently issued regulations, some with risk management and employee benefit implications.

A vast array of proposed rules and regulations that have not been officially adopted or have been recently adopted but not implemented, are now subject to White House review before further action.

For example, the memo signed by Obama's chief of staff, Rahm Emanuel, halts implementation of a proposed rule mandating how the U.S. Occupational Safety and Health Administration and the U.S. Mine Safety and Health Administration conduct risk assessments of toxic substances and hazardous chemicals in the workplace.

Democrats and labor charge the rule would weaken worksite regulation, and they say President George W. Bush's administration hurried to implement it before he vacated the White House.

The U.S. Chamber of Commerce supports the measure, which was posted in the August 29 Federal Register. The chamber argues it would improve safety by standardizing analysis of risks posed by chemicals and toxins.

 

Another proposed regulation that could be affected would require that contracts between employee benefit plans and plan service providers disclose any conflict of interests the service providers may have and the reasonableness of their fees. It appeared in the December 13, 2007, Federal Register, but a final rule was never implemented.

An interim Coast Guard rule that would have been effective March 17 could also be affected. It seeks to prevent pollution from ships by amending regulations for equipment used to reduce oil discharges. It was posted in the January 16, 2009, Federal Register.

Filed by Roberto Ceniceros of Business Insurance, a sister publication of Workforce Management. To comment, e-mail editors@workforce.com.

Workforce Management's online news feed is now available via Twitter

Leave A Comment

Guidelines: Comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. We will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. You are fully responsible for the content you post.

Daily Q&A

How Do We Build a World-Class Recruiting Department?

I need to establish a strategic plan on how we can become a world-class staffing/recruiting department. Unfortunately, all the historical data from previous recruiting managers got tossed. Do you have any simple tips on how to begin this ambitious plan?

—World-Class Ambition, staffing manager, software/services, Pennsylvania

Read Answer

Stay Connected

Join our community for unlimited access to the latest tips, news and information in the HR world.

HR Jobs

View All Job Listings

Search