Top
Stories

Latest News

Military Veteran Wins Damages, Reinstatement in USERRA Case

A federal judge has awarded about $779,000 in back pay, damages and attorney fees to a financial advisor who was not restored to his previous pay at Wachovia Services after returning from active military duty.

  • March 26, 2009
  • Comments (0)

A federal judge has awarded about $779,000 in back pay, damages and attorney fees to a financial advisor who was not restored to his previous pay at Wachovia Services after returning from active military duty.

In a ruling last week in Michael Serricchio v. Wachovia Securities L.L.C., New Haven, Connecticut, federal Judge Janet Bond Arterton made the award under the Uniformed Services Employment and Reemployment Rights Act and ordered Wachovia to reinstate Serricchio effective April 1.

Samuel F. Wright, an attorney with Tulley Rinckey in Washington and a specialist in USERRA cases, said that if upheld ultimately, the award would be the largest ever under the 1994 federal law that is intended to safeguard the employment rights and benefits of military reserve members upon their return to civilian life.

In testimony before a congressional subcommittee in February 2008, Serricchio said he earned more than $75,000 a year as a financial advisor for Prudential Securities.

A member of the Air Force Reserves, he was called to active duty in September 2001.

Upon returning more than two years later, he approached his firm, which since had become Wachovia and now is part of Wells Fargo & Co.

He was told he could have an advance of $2,000 per month, which he would be required to repay through commissions earned through cold-calling new accounts or from savings.

Instead, Serricchio filed suit in 2005.

A jury ruled in Serricchio’s favor in June 2008.

Last week, Judge Arterton awarded Serricchio $291,000 in back pay and $389,000 in damages, plus fees and costs. The judge also ordered Wachovia to reinstate Serricchio, effective April 1, as a financial advisor with the full package of employment benefits.

The judge ruled Wachovia must pay Serricchio a monthly salary of $12,300 for three months and a monthly draw of $12,300 for the next nine months as an advance on future commissions.

Reacting to the ruling, a spokesman for Charlotte, North Carolina-based Wachovia said, “We are considering our options, including a possible appeal.”

“It’s a very important decision because it shows that an individual can take on a large institution and vindicate their rights,” said David Golub of Silver Golub & Teitell in Stamford, Connecticut, who was Serricchio’s attorney.

Wright said the case is also important because it shows USERRA applies to employees who work on commission.

Filed by Judy Greenwald of Business Insurance, a sister publication of Workforce Management. To comment, e-mail editors@workforce.com.

Workforce Management's online news feed is now available via Twitter

Leave A Comment

Guidelines: Comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. We will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. You are fully responsible for the content you post.

Daily Q&A

How Do We Persuade Management to Create Flex Schedules?

My company doesn’t have an official flex schedule policy, which means that some departments are able to have a flex schedule while departments such as mine do not (I work in human resources). What is the best way to present a request for consideration to our human resources executives to see if this arrangement could benefit us?

—Nimble We’re Not, HR generalist, financial/insurance/real estate, Iowa City, Iowa

Read Answer

Stay Connected

Join our community for unlimited access to the latest tips, news and information in the HR world.

HR Jobs

View All Job Listings

Search