Top
Stories

Featured Article Getting Minorities to Buy In on Retirement February 13, 2012
Featured Article State Law Favored Over Feds in Overtime Case February 12, 2012
Featured Article Adopting a Social Media Mind-Set February 12, 2012
Featured Article Social Media and Collaboration Tools February 12, 2012
Featured Article Arbitration Pact Barring Class Lawsuits Violates NLRA February 12, 2012
Featured Article The Last Word: Backyard Retirement Plan February 11, 2012
Featured Article State Public Sector Retirement Plan Roundup February 10, 2012
Featured Article States Taking a Hard Look at Pensions February 10, 2012
Featured Article Wisconsin's Tough Choice February 10, 2012
Featured Article Small Employers Exploring Health Care Exchange Options February 8, 2012

Dear Workforce

Q: Quelling Anxiety About Job Evaluations


We are implementing a project to evaluate jobs. Naturally, people are nervous. Many think the company is trying to find out who is underpaid or overpaid. (That’s not the case; this is simply a long-overdue project.) But people remain skeptical. How can we convince them the evaluation is not being done in preparation for cutting jobs?
—Miscommunication in Human Resources and Administration, nonprofit, Singapore

A:

Dear Miscommunication:

The phrase "job evaluation" is just plain scary. People might be less anxious about the job-evaluation process if it were termed a "position-appreciatiation program" instead. Progressive companies ensure that they pay employees fairly and competitively. Job evaluation plays an important role in doing so.

I've found the best way to eliminate fear is to tell employees the full truth about the process. Start with the basics.

Doing job evaluations means you are looking to the future. If your organization wants to cut jobs, there are easier ways to than a job-evaluation program. Frankly, most companies with major jobs reduction in mind don't have the time or money for this type of project. What you have in mind is all about planning for tomorrow, not planning for a layoff. Make that clear.

You are evaluating jobs, not people. Many good employees have trouble with the concept of job evaluation. They believe that judging their job is synonymous with judging them. The truth is that job evaluation primarily is done to ensure that people are appropriately paid for their responsibilities. Performance evaluations judge a person's contribution to the job. The two share nothing in common.

Employees have a lot more to gain than to lose. Most employees are paid properly and not affected at all by job evaluation. I've seen many more instances of employees being paid below their targeted pay range, and receiving salary increases, than being paid too much and being "red circled."

The process promotes an open dialogue about each position. Employees are involved in the process and provide much of the information necessary to accomplish it. You will be looking at the realities of each job, probably for the first time in a long time. Many employees believe that the rigors of their job are not fully understood or appreciated. This process should help eliminate that feeling.

Once employees know the truth behind your intent, they frequently become excited about the process. Straightforward, honest communication helps build employee confidence.

SOURCE: Rick Galbreath, Performance Growth Partners, Bloomington, Illinois, February 4, 2009

LEARN MORE: The Jobs You Can't Do Without discusses the importance of identifying critical jobs based on a company's business goals. Also, six key questions that HR directors and CEOs should ask to ensure they have an adequate supply of top performers.

The information contained in this article is intended to provide useful information on the topic covered, but should not be construed as legal advice or a legal opinion. Also remember that state laws may differ from the federal law.

Ask a Question

Dear Workforce Newsletter

Ask a Question

Sign Up!

Get the Dear Workforce e-newsletter.

Leave A Comment

Guidelines: Comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. We will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. You are fully responsible for the content you post.

Daily Q&A

What Can We Do When an Employee Has Exhausted the Leave-of-Absence Time Allowed by Our Workers' Comp Policy?

We have an employee who has been on workers' compensation for two years now—the claim is grandfathered under our old policy, but it's since changed. Now, when injured employees are on workers' compensation, they receive two-thirds of their pay and must use sick days and vacation to cover the remaining one-third. May we begin requiring the injured employee to use personal time?

—Sick About This, benefits coordinator, mining/oil/gas, Illinois

Read Answer

Stay Connected

Join our community for unlimited access to the latest tips, news and information in the HR world.

HR Jobs

View All Job Listings

Search